An audit to investigate the impact of false positive breast screening results and diagnostic work-up on re-engagement with subsequent routine screening

Abstract

Introduction: Women attending breast screening may have suspicious mammographic findings that

A qualitative analysis of staff-client interactions within a breast cancer assessment clinic

“…14 A retrospective six year audit undertaken within a UK breast screening service identified that the percentage of eligible FP women failing to re-engage with screening was considerably lower than non-engagement in the general screening population (15% compared to 29%). 3 However, those undergoing biopsies were more likely to return for routine screening than those undergoing minimally invasive assessment (93% compared to 82.5%). 3 This was at odds with published literature 12;14 and suggested that the additional support received by women having biopsies has a beneficial effect on their future re-engagement with screening.…”

“…3 However, those undergoing biopsies were more likely to return for routine screening than those undergoing minimally invasive assessment (93% compared to 82.5%). 3 This was at odds with published literature 12;14 and suggested that the additional support received by women having biopsies has a beneficial effect on their future re-engagement with screening. 3 A qualitative study was initiated to explore in detail the nature of staff-client interactions within a breast assessment clinic affiliated to the NHS Breast Screening Programme.…”

“…2 The percentage of women subsequently found to be clear of cancer is variable, but previously noted to be 57.43% in the study centre. 3 However there is some evidence to suggest that these false positive [FP] women are at greater risk of interval cancers and larger cancers at presentation. 2;4;5 Re-engagement with routine screening following a FP result is therefore essential.…”