An augmented reality (AR)-based vocational task prompting system for people with cognitive impairments

Chang, Yao‐Jen; Kang, Ya‐Shu; Huang, Po-Chiao

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.026

Cited by 79 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Their system can be applied to teach other kinds of upper body movements beyond just rehabilitation purposes. In another paper, Chang et al (2013) reported a study where AR helped cognitively impaired people to gain vocational job skills and the gained skills were maintained even after the intervention. Hsiao et al (2012) and Hsiao (2010) presented a couple of studies where physical activity was included in the learning experience to promote "learning while exercising".…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2013) surgical interventions (Volonté et al, 2011), games, home-training system, online teaching (Andujar, Mejías, & Marquez, 2011),and learning disabilities (Chang et al, 2013). Augmented reality can lower the barrier to entry for students engaging in virtual content.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive augmented reality using Scratch 2.0 to improve physical activities for children with developmental disabilities

Lin

Chang

2015

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ramli & Zaman (2011) established a usability evaluation method of AR basic reading courseware, while Colpani & Petrucelli (2016) proposed a design framework for educational activities based on gamification (i.e., activities adapted to the mechanics of a game). Chang et al (2013) designed and implemented a AR-based vocational task prompting system which used picture cues in order to guide users through successive steps. This help allowed users to identify mistakes and make the appropriate corrections.…”

Section: Rq1: What Was the Purpose Of The Studies?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the type of AR used in the studies, the frameworks for the design and/or evaluation of educational activities mentioned above (Colpani & Petrucelli, 2016;Ramli & Zaman, 2011) and the AR-based vocational skills training method (Chang et al, 2013) are especially oriented to stationary devices in a classroom or workplace context. Other studies used the stationary AR for the initial training of the participants in certain tasks, such as orientation in the environment through virtual navigation.…”

Section: Rq2: What Type Of Ar Was Used In the Study?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research review on augmented reality as an educational resource for people with intellectual disabilities

Gómez‐Puerta¹,

Chiner²,

Melero-Pérez³

et al. 2019

Revista INFAD de Psicología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study reviewed nine publications related to the application of augmented reality (AR)-based interventions to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). The lines of research developed focus on the areas of education, personal autonomy and health promotion. The studies are theoretical frameworks, design of AR-based applications, or quasi-experimental study designs without a control group. The samples, all of less than 15 subjects, have been chosen under intentional criteria. The devices that seem to prevail as preferred for its application in this group are the portable ones due to the wide range of intervention possibilities that they offer as well as the development potential of the personal autonomy that they allow. Results offer a positive view of the application of this technology to people with ID, although the characteristics of the studies do not allow yet its generalization. Among the reported benefits are: enhancing learning achievement, motivation and enjoyment of tasks, helping to understand information, enhancing orientation, raising the level of engagement.

show abstract

An augmented reality (AR)-based vocational task prompting system for people with cognitive impairments

Cited by 79 publications

References 17 publications

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

Interactive augmented reality using Scratch 2.0 to improve physical activities for children with developmental disabilities

Research review on augmented reality as an educational resource for people with intellectual disabilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About