AIM To develop and evaluate a classification system for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of children with cerebral palsy (CP) that can be used in CP registers.METHOD The classification system was based on pathogenic patterns occurring in different periods of brain development. The MRI classification system (MRICS) consists of five main groups: maldevelopments, predominant white matter injury, predominant grey matter injury, miscellaneous, and normal findings. A detailed manual for the descriptions of these patterns was developed, including test cases (www.scpenetwork.eu/en/my-scpe/rtm/neuroimaging/ cp-neuroimaging/). A literature review was performed and MRICS was compared with other classification systems. An exercise was carried out to check applicability and interrater reliability. Professionals working with children with CP or in CP registers were invited to participate in the exercise and chose to classify either 18 MRIs or MRI reports of children with CP.RESULTS Classification systems in the literature were compatible with MRICS and harmonization possible. Interrater reliability was found to be good overall (k=0.69; 0.54-0.82) among the 41 participants and very good (k=0.81; 0.74-0.92) using the classification based on imaging reports.INTERPRETATION Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) proposes the MRICS as a reliable tool. Together with its manual it is simple to apply for CP registers.Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) has, through agreement in definitions and classifications of cerebral palsy (CP), developed a common language in the domain of CP.1,2 This has been a prerequisite for comparative studies, 3,4 and for studies which necessitate a large population basis. 4,5 This common language has generated a lot of interest even beyond Europe: the definitions and classifications are widely used, and SCPE papers extensively cited.CP is a clinical diagnosis, based upon neurological symptoms and a motor disorder causing an activity limitation.6 SCPE does not consider neuroimaging a prerequisite for the diagnosis of CP.2 Up to now, normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not exclude the diagnosis of CP. Moreover, neuroimaging, especially MRI, is not available nor used in all countries to the same extent. In addition, the use of MRI, as well as knowledge of its role in the understanding of CP pathogenesis, has dramatically increased during the last 15 years, which would make comparison between countries and time periods difficult. Most importantly, there is no commonly agreed neuroimaging classification for CP at this time.Although neuroimaging is not part of the CP definition, neuroimaging findings are abnormal in more than 80% of children with CP, 7-9 disclosing the pathogenic pattern responsible for the CP. Neuroimaging may also help to understand the structure-function relationship. 10,11 National guidelines recommend MRI as the first diagnostic step after history taking, neurological examination, and examination of additional impairments.12 Therefore, a need was exp...