2018 25th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iwssip.2018.8439184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automated and Accurate Methodology to Assess Ki-67 Labeling Index of Immunohistochemical Staining Images of Breast Cancer Tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the methods of inspection and evaluation were insufficient due to variability between institutions, which precluded this cutoff from being included in a verified clinical guideline [9]. Recently, as inspection methods and evaluations have become automated, the objectivity of Ki-67 values has been secured to some extent; however, it is challenging to ensure standardization across all institutions [29,30]. Our study proves that Ki-67 level is valuable as a prognostic factor despite such issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the methods of inspection and evaluation were insufficient due to variability between institutions, which precluded this cutoff from being included in a verified clinical guideline [9]. Recently, as inspection methods and evaluations have become automated, the objectivity of Ki-67 values has been secured to some extent; however, it is challenging to ensure standardization across all institutions [29,30]. Our study proves that Ki-67 level is valuable as a prognostic factor despite such issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Lopez et al [19] brain hot-spot detection 4 WSI Acc = 93.8% Niazi et al [18] digestive system hot-spot and cell detection 55 images Acc = 94.60% Lu et al [17] adrenal glands hot-spot detection 50 WSI rho > 0.8. Xing et al [20] gastro-intestinal tract, pancreas cell detection 46 cases F1 = 90% Swiderska et al [21] brain hot-spot detection and LI estimation 104 WSI rho >0.95 Laurinavicius et al [9] breast hot-spot detection 152 WSI good agreement Valous et al [22] pancreas heterogeneity of proliferation 43 WSI -Paulik et al [23] breast detecting and count nuclear signals 25 WSI PPV = 90.23% Pilutti et al [24] breast hot-spot detection 50 cases, 3 experts Acc = 82% Razavi et al [30] breast LI estimation 30 TMA, 1 expert Acc = 91% Gerard et al [31] breast LI estimation 80 TMA Acc = 93,5% Ko et al [25] breast LI estimation 15 WSI Acc = 89%…”
Section: Classical Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In H&E-based tumour classification, most studies leverage the pattern recognition capabilities of conventional convolutional neural networks (CNN). While these approaches have also been applied to the assessment IHC studies,8 precise quantification of events usually requires nuclei (instance) segmentation approaches 9–11. This can be achieved with variants such as Mask R-CNN that automatically apply and refine multiple ROIs to isolate individual nuclei while also benefiting from the superior generalisability of CNNs for object segmentation and classification 9 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%