2023
DOI: 10.1002/rob.22268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated apple harvesting robot—From system design to field evaluation

Kaixiang Zhang,
Kyle Lammers,
Pengyu Chu
et al.

Abstract: Decreased availability and rising cost in labor poses a serious threat to the long‐term profitability and sustainability of the apple industry in the United States and many other countries. Harvest automation is thus urgently needed. In this paper, we present the unified system design and field evaluation of a new apple harvesting robot. The robot is mainly composed of a specially designed perception component, a four‐degree‐of‐freedom manipulator, an improved vacuum‐based soft end‐effector, and a dropping/cat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the results with other recent field-tested fruit-harvesting robots, we find that Yin et al [23] tested a citrus-harvesting robot in the actual field with a success rate of 87.2% and a pick up time of 10.9 s. Furthermore, Zhang et al [47] harvested apples in the field using a four-degree-of-freedom robot using the CNN algorithm for fruit detection having a success rate of 82.4% and a pick time of 6 s. The fruit detection accuracy was 90%. Moreover, Hu et al [48] also tested a citrus-harvesting robot with a success rate of 90% and a pick up time of 15 s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the results with other recent field-tested fruit-harvesting robots, we find that Yin et al [23] tested a citrus-harvesting robot in the actual field with a success rate of 87.2% and a pick up time of 10.9 s. Furthermore, Zhang et al [47] harvested apples in the field using a four-degree-of-freedom robot using the CNN algorithm for fruit detection having a success rate of 82.4% and a pick time of 6 s. The fruit detection accuracy was 90%. Moreover, Hu et al [48] also tested a citrus-harvesting robot with a success rate of 90% and a pick up time of 15 s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Comparing the results with other recent field-tested fruit-harvesting robots, we find that Yin et al [23] tested a citrus-harvesting robot in the actual field with a success rate of 87.2% and a pick up time of 10.9 s. Furthermore, Zhang et al [47] harvested apples in the…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, an active laser scanning scheme (ALACS) was introduced with the help of an FLIR camera to improve localization accuracy, and laser scanning was used to recalculate the 3D position of the apple by comparing the depth frame obtained from the RealSense RGB-D camera. Robust calibration was conducted based on the random sample consensus method for calibrating the model parameters related to collected data [ 44 , 45 ]. The sensor fusion method that has already been used requires complex calibration methods, especially when fusion was conducted with LiDAR [ 43 ] or high processing power based on the complexity of the algorithm, which requires high computational power in applications with robotic systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control systems, navigation algorithm, and objection detection algorithms utilized in various agricultural and non-agricultural robots [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] can also be adapted for cotton harvesting robots. Several research articles have focused on distinct sub-components of a robotic cotton harvesting system, such as the development of a cotton boll detection model [14][15][16][17][18][19], navigation and path planning algorithms [20][21][22][23][24][25], and end-effector designs [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%