2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated ASPECTS method with atlas-based segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the ASPECTS remains a dependable and uncomplicated scoring system for appraising early ischemic changes within the distribution zones of the MCA, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential variability in interpretations due to divergent levels of expertise among non-contrast CT observers. 34 In contrast, the RAPID ASPECTS system harnesses validated machine-learning algorithms to autonomously identify cerebral regions and compute scores, thereby enabling swift and more harmonious assessment for thrombectomy eligibility (j = 0.9), surpassing the concordance of human readers (j = 0.57 and j = 0.56). 31 Prior investigative trajectories focusing on the predictive potential of CT Hu values for DCI and clinical outcomes predominantly centered on average Hu values within specific hemorrhage tiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the ASPECTS remains a dependable and uncomplicated scoring system for appraising early ischemic changes within the distribution zones of the MCA, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential variability in interpretations due to divergent levels of expertise among non-contrast CT observers. 34 In contrast, the RAPID ASPECTS system harnesses validated machine-learning algorithms to autonomously identify cerebral regions and compute scores, thereby enabling swift and more harmonious assessment for thrombectomy eligibility (j = 0.9), surpassing the concordance of human readers (j = 0.57 and j = 0.56). 31 Prior investigative trajectories focusing on the predictive potential of CT Hu values for DCI and clinical outcomes predominantly centered on average Hu values within specific hemorrhage tiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four other variables are the patient age, baseline NIHSS, glucose levels and baseline ASPECTS score (also an imaging biomarker). In this work, we used expert annotations for this variable, but there are several published works [42,43] and commercial products [44,45] that predict the ASPECT score using machine learning. The particular selection of five variables in the LR 5vars SN model came from a preliminary analysis of the feature importance of the LR 8vars experiment (second row of Figure 5).…”
Section: Hybrid Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%