2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated bolide detection pipeline for GOES GLM

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our analysis used a new technique to estimate the altitude of GLM emissions, in addition to the traditional latitude and longitude, which was made possible by simultaneous observations (i.e., stereo) from both GLMs (see details in Materials and Methods) ( 38 ). A similar technique has been used to calculate the altitude of bolides high in the atmosphere (tens of kilometers in altitude) from stereo GLM observations ( 53 ). The magnetic field data allowed the current moment and charge moment change to be calculated from recorded waveforms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our analysis used a new technique to estimate the altitude of GLM emissions, in addition to the traditional latitude and longitude, which was made possible by simultaneous observations (i.e., stereo) from both GLMs (see details in Materials and Methods) ( 38 ). A similar technique has been used to calculate the altitude of bolides high in the atmosphere (tens of kilometers in altitude) from stereo GLM observations ( 53 ). The magnetic field data allowed the current moment and charge moment change to be calculated from recorded waveforms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flash was not identified as a fireball through automated processing of GLM data (Smith et al., 2021) or U.S. Government satellite data (https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/) (Brown, Spalding, et al., 2002). In these automated detection pipelines, fireballs are identified by linear trajectories of individual flashes, and a light curve comprising greater energy release toward the end of the trajectory/flash event (Rumpf et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No detections were correlated either spatially or temporally with the timing of the Golden fireball, consistent with our ground‐based peak magnitude of −14. The location of the fireball was near the edge of the GLM field of view for GLM from both satellites (Smith et al., 2021) so we expect the actual threshold limit to be brighter than −14. As an empirical check, we note that Jenniskens et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%