2018
DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automated Grading System for Detection of Vision-Threatening Referable Diabetic Retinopathy on the Basis of Color Fundus Photographs

Abstract: OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to describe the development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based, deep learning algorithm (DLA) for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy (DR). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA DLA using a convolutional neural network was developed for automated detection of vision-threatening referable DR (preproliferative DR or worse, diabetic macular edema, or both). The DLA was tested by using a set of 106,244 nonstereoscopic retinal images. A panel of ophthalmologist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
149
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
149
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in the DR‐AMD dataset show the system is able to differentiate between the two diseases, which is one of the main aspects in joint detection, since the presence of other pathologies may affect the performance of a DL system when detecting a given disease (Li et al. ). When identifying referable DR, false‐positive detections corresponded to 9.4% of the cases graded as non‐referable DR in the reference standard, which can be divided into controls or referable AMD cases, being the latter the 17.4% of the cases wrongly classified as referable DR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in the DR‐AMD dataset show the system is able to differentiate between the two diseases, which is one of the main aspects in joint detection, since the presence of other pathologies may affect the performance of a DL system when detecting a given disease (Li et al. ). When identifying referable DR, false‐positive detections corresponded to 9.4% of the cases graded as non‐referable DR in the reference standard, which can be divided into controls or referable AMD cases, being the latter the 17.4% of the cases wrongly classified as referable DR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ting et al [14] validated their DLS using 494,661 retinal images, demonstrating the DLS had high sensitivity and specificity for identifying diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases, for the detection of any DR (AUC = 0.94-0.96); for possible glaucoma, AUC was 0.942; for AMD, AUC was 0.931. Similarly, Li et al [15] describe the development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based in 71,043 retinal images acquired from a web-based, deep learning algorithm for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. Testing against the independent multiethnic data set achieved an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.955, 92.5%, and 98.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology offers new possibilities for policy evaluation in conjunction with the aforementioned classical approaches. Artificial intelligence tools are already widely used in the field of healthcare in areas such as the prediction and management of depression, voice recognition for people with speech impediments, the detection of changes in the biopsychosocial status of patients with multiple morbidities, stress control, the treatment of phantom limb pain, smoking cessation, personalized nutrition by prediction of glycaemic response, to try to detect signs of depression and in particular for reading medical images [2][3][4][5][6]. The generation of data implies a huge potential for the impact assessment of these interventions with new analytical tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%