2019
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated, laser‐based measurement system for nitrous oxide isotope and isotopomer ratios at nanomolar levels

Abstract: Rationale Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an atmospheric trace gas regulating Earth's climate, and is a key intermediate of many nitrogen cycling processes in aquatic ecosystems. Laser‐based technology for N2O concentration and isotopic/isotopomeric analyses has potential advantages, which include high analytical specificity, low sample size requirement and reduced cost. Methods An autosampler with a purge‐and‐trap module is coupled to a cavity ring‐down spectrometer to achieve automated and high‐throughput measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the magnitude of this effect ultimately varied across the analyzers and was dependent on N 2 O mixing ratios, the effect of a change in O 2 composition of 20.5 % was typically on the order of 10 ‰ to 30 ‰ for δ values. Similar O 2 dependencies have been reported by Erler et al (2015) for CRDS N 2 O isotope laser spectrometers, as well as for CRDS H 2 O isotope analyzers (Johnson and Rella, 2017). The underlying reason for this effect is differences in N 2 versus O 2 (and Ar) broadening parameters of the probed N 2 O isotopocule lines.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Precision And Accuracy Of N 2 O Isotopsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although the magnitude of this effect ultimately varied across the analyzers and was dependent on N 2 O mixing ratios, the effect of a change in O 2 composition of 20.5 % was typically on the order of 10 ‰ to 30 ‰ for δ values. Similar O 2 dependencies have been reported by Erler et al (2015) for CRDS N 2 O isotope laser spectrometers, as well as for CRDS H 2 O isotope analyzers (Johnson and Rella, 2017). The underlying reason for this effect is differences in N 2 versus O 2 (and Ar) broadening parameters of the probed N 2 O isotopocule lines.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Precision And Accuracy Of N 2 O Isotopsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The PT‐CRDS is an automated, laser‐based system that provides comparable accuracy and precision to gas chromatography and isotope ratio mass spectrometer techniques for N 2 O concentration and isotope/isotopomer ratio measurements, respectively. A full description of this technique is outlined in Ji and Grundle (2019). Isotopic analysis determines the relative abundances of nitrogen isotopes (δ 15 N bulk ) and oxygen isotopes (δ 18 O) of the entire N 2 O pool, whereas isotopomeric analysis discerns the intramolecular nitrogen isotope substitution (isotopomers) on the linear asymmetric N 2 O molecule (N = N = O).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heating to 480 K released the gaseous N 2 O, after which concentrations and isotope/isotopomer ratios were measured by quantitative light dissipation at specific wavelengths ( 14 N = 15 N = 16 O, 15 N = 14 N = 16 O, and 14 N = 14 N = 18 O at 2195.76195, 2198.79576, and 2195.95102 cm −1 , respectively). Raw isotopic measurements were corrected for sample size‐dependent isotopic deviations caused by varying N 2 O concentrations (Ji & Grundle, 2019) and calibrated with isotopic reference materials (see Table S2). Because the optimal quantity of N 2 O for highly accurate isotopic/isotopomeric analyses by PT‐CRDS is 0.5–0.8 nmol‐N 2 O, samples from 130 and 160 m in April and 160 m samples in June did not contain enough N 2 O, and, as such, those results are not reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, the work presented in Lee et al (2017) and Ji and Grundle (2019) are the only published uses of G5131-i models. A prior model (the G5101-i), which employs a different 5 spectral region and does not offer the capability for  18 O was used by Peng et al (2014), Erler et al (2015), Li et al (2015), Lebegue et al (2016) and Winther et al (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%