2022
DOI: 10.3390/life12081134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automated Method of Causal Inference of the Underlying Cause of Death of Citizens

Abstract: It is of great significance to correctly infer the underlying cause of death for citizens, especially under the current worldwide situation. The medical resources of all countries are overwhelmed under the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and countries need to allocate limited resources to the most suitable place. Traditionally, the cause-of-death inference relies on manual methods, which require a large resource cost and are not so efficient. To address the challenges, in this work, we present a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to country-specific variations, validating the model for cross-country applicability remains an ongoing research challenge (4). Using an attention mechanism, the model exhibited an accuracy range of 80.9% to 81.7% (11). Researchers from the Beijing Institute of Technology and China CDC developed a hybrid inference model with the Sink-CF algorithm, improving precision and recall for determining the fundamental cause of death to 93.8% and 90.1%, respectively (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to country-specific variations, validating the model for cross-country applicability remains an ongoing research challenge (4). Using an attention mechanism, the model exhibited an accuracy range of 80.9% to 81.7% (11). Researchers from the Beijing Institute of Technology and China CDC developed a hybrid inference model with the Sink-CF algorithm, improving precision and recall for determining the fundamental cause of death to 93.8% and 90.1%, respectively (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%