2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00259-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated phylogenetic key for classifying homeoboxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Placement of these morphologically classified specimens was used to identify the clades corresponding to each of the 3 taxonomic groups. Finally, following Kershaw et al (2013), we applied characteristic attributes (CAs) diagnosis (Davis & N ixon 1992, Sarkar et al 2002, Lowenstein et al 2009) to controlregion sequences of B. e. edeni, B. e. brydei, B. omurai, and the haplotypes from the GOMx whales. We first used the 9 diagnostic sites identified by Kershaw et al (2013) to try to classify the GOMx Bryde's whales to the recognized subspecies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placement of these morphologically classified specimens was used to identify the clades corresponding to each of the 3 taxonomic groups. Finally, following Kershaw et al (2013), we applied characteristic attributes (CAs) diagnosis (Davis & N ixon 1992, Sarkar et al 2002, Lowenstein et al 2009) to controlregion sequences of B. e. edeni, B. e. brydei, B. omurai, and the haplotypes from the GOMx whales. We first used the 9 diagnostic sites identified by Kershaw et al (2013) to try to classify the GOMx Bryde's whales to the recognized subspecies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on peptide sequence identity with known Hox genes, DNA sequences could be assigned unambiguously to paralog groups (PG) 1, 3, 9, 11, 13, as well as to a more poorly resolved ''middle group'' gene (paralog groups 4-7). The automated phylogenetic key for classifying homeoboxes described by Sarkar et al (2002) unfortunately is not applicable since it requires homeobox fragments that are longer than 27 amino acids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. The DNA sequence attributes in the two columns by themselves constitute two private DNA positions. However, in combination these two columns provide a 'pure' diagnostic combination (AA versus AG or GA; 'compound pure' character in the terminology of Sarkar et al 2002). D. The four columns marked by the shading for D are neither diagnostic nor private.…”
Section: A Character Based Barcoder Proposedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these advantages it could be argued that a corroborated total evidence tree could be used as a guide tree for identifying the phylogenetic affinities of an unknown individual's sequence, assuming that the query sequence is one of the gene regions used to construct the total evidence tree. There are bioinformatics tools to aid in the placement of a query sequence based on the presence of shared characters that are diagnostic for nodes on the tree (Sarkar et al 2002). However, there is a third drawback to the use of a tree building approach to species identification.…”
Section: Introduction: Building a Better Dna Barcodermentioning
confidence: 99%