An automated reasoning framework for translational research

Abstract

In this paper we propose a novel approach to the design and implementation of knowledge-based decision support systems for translational research, specifically tailored to the analysis and interpretation of data from high-throughput experiments. Our approach is based on a general epistemological model of the scientific discovery process that provides a well-founded framework for integrating experimental data with preexisting knowledge and with automated inference tools. In order to demonstrate the usefulness and power of the proposed framework, we present its application to Genome-Wide Association Studies, and we use it to reproduce a portion of the initial analysis performed on the well-known WTCCC dataset. Finally, we describe a computational system we are developing, aimed at assisting translational research. The system, based on the proposed model, will be able to automatically plan and perform knowledge discovery steps, to keep track of the inferences performed, and to explain the obtained results.

Selection of disease‐specific biomarkers by integrating inflammatory mediators with clinical informatics in AECOPD patients: a preliminary study

“…There is a growing need of the large-scale translational approach to evaluate databases generated from high-throughput experimental methods [35]. Given the systemic consequences of COPD, use of a composite index to assess prognosis provided a more comprehensive way to evaluate COPD [36].…”

Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science

“…Genomic sequencing could also be obtained as routine screening of public health utility independently from an outcome of interest. Riva et al (2010) presented an operational framework for GWAS, based on the cyclic deductive-abductive model of Ramoni et al (1992) which included refinement of phenotypes and integration with other knowledge base, implementing practically a full-fledged THARK. However, Riva's framework is only in part exempt from threats to reproducibility; as it covers hypothesis multiplicity for phenotypes and basic validation, but not other forking paths such as model choice and reporting bias.…”

Improving data and knowledge management to better integrate health care and research

“…An important point to emphasize is that very different levels of evidence are needed for CDSSs compared with what is required for research grade knowledge discovery. Medical reasoning may be represented by epistemological models, which are amenable to partial automation , and in all cases, the data should be generated or chosen to fit a purpose. Researchers, for example, must design their experiments and simulations to record as much detailed information as possible to facilitate a comprehensive exploration of the biomedical question.…”