Effect of increasing the organic loading rate on the codigestion and mono-digestion of cattle slurry and maize." Water Science & Technology 66, no. 11 (2012)
AbstractCo-digestion of cattle slurry and maize has been shown to have benefits for both, improving the biogas yield of the slurry and stability of digestion of the maize. The effect of increasing the total loading rate from 3 to 6 g VS l -1 day -1 on the co-digestion of cattle slurry and maize, mixed at equal volatile solids volumes, was investigated in laboratory-scale continuously stirred digesters. These were compared to similar digesters evaluating the increase of 1.5 to 3 g VS l -1 day -1 loading rates of slurry and maize digested separately. Compared to mono-digestion of the substrates, where the digestion of maize failed at loading rates greater than 2.5 g VS l -1 day -1, the co-digestion of cattle slurry and maize was feasible at all the loading rates tested with an increase in the volumetric methane yield occurring with loading rate. Even at the lowest rate of loading the addition of equal amount of volatile solids of maize to slurry lead to an increase in volumetric methane yield of 219% Keywords Anaerobic digestion; cattle slurry; co-digestion; kinetics; maize
INTRODUCTIONThe storage and use of animal wastes of which the EU-27 produces 1284 million tonnes per year (Holm-Nielsen, 2007) leads to the production of greenhouse gases including methane. Anaerobic digestion is a well-established process that can divert the methane released from animal wastes, including cattle slurry, into a source of bio-energy. Bio-energy production is attractive to farmers as it can supply the energy required by the farm and provide an additional source of income; anaerobic digestion also produces a digestate that can be used as fertiliser. Unfortunately, the digestion of cattle slurry alone yields relatively low amounts of bio-energy in comparison to feedstocks such as energy crops (Weiland, 2006). Crop materials such as maize are therefore added to the slurry in order to improve gas production and thus potential income. The digestion of energy crops alone can also be difficult and co-digestion with cattle slurry can improve the buffering capacity of the system, as has been shown for cosubstrates such as fruit and vegetable waste and slaughterhouse waste (Alvarez and Lidén, 2008;Banks et al., 2010) A possible further benefit is the potential for synergy between the co-substrates which some studies have reported (e.g. Machmüller et al., 2007;Cornell et al., 2008). There is little published work on synergy, however, and the effects are often identified through comparison of results from mono-and co-digestion trials following different methodologies, e.g. batch and semi-continuous. This approach may not provide an accurate picture as it has been shown that batch and semi-continuous trials can produce different results (Callaghan et al., 1998 and1999).