2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated system for predicting detection limit and precision profile from a chromatogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aliquot of the extracted test sample was injected into the HPLC to obtain a curve pending peak area and profile in a chromatogram. Then the peak area of the sample is compared with that of the standard, relative to the concentration of the standard to obtain the concentration of the sample, the following chromatographic conditions were employed; Agilent Technologies HPLC 1200, Column: uBondapak C18, Carrier: Acetonitrile/Water 70:30 and 5µL injected @ 2ml / min flow rate (Akira et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aliquot of the extracted test sample was injected into the HPLC to obtain a curve pending peak area and profile in a chromatogram. Then the peak area of the sample is compared with that of the standard, relative to the concentration of the standard to obtain the concentration of the sample, the following chromatographic conditions were employed; Agilent Technologies HPLC 1200, Column: uBondapak C18, Carrier: Acetonitrile/Water 70:30 and 5µL injected @ 2ml / min flow rate (Akira et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were analyzed in duplicate, while working solution standards were analyzed in triplicate. The detection (DL) and quantitation (QL) limits of the method were calculated based on the parameters for each constructed analytical curve, using the following mathematical relations [23,24]:…”
Section: Adsorbent Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%