ble. Kust and Smith (1961) reported that 'Vernal' alfalfa ideally would be harvested three times (at about 42-d Producers in the lower Midwest often plant grazing-type alfalfa intervals) before 1 September in Wisconsin as a compro-(Medicago sativa L.) cultivars assuming they can withstand frequent hay harvests. However, little research has examined the long-term mise among forage yield, quality, and stand persistence. effects of frequent hay harvests on grazing-type compared with hay-However, harvesting four or more times during the type alfalfa. Our objective was to determine how cultivar-type and growing season or after 1 September reduced yields the harvest frequency change long-term alfalfa yields, quality, and stand following year by 30 to 78%. Subsequent studies by persistence. 'Alfagraze' (grazing-type), 'Pioneer 5373' (modern, Matches et al. (1970), Brink and Marten (1989), Brown multipest resistant hay-type), and 'Cody' (older hay-type) alfalfa were et al. (1990), and Sheaffer et al. (2000) have shown that seeded on 1 Apr. 1994, near Mt. Vernon, MO. Cultivars were main alfalfa should be harvested every 30 to 35 d during the plots, and four, five, or six harvests before 15 September (42, 34, and growing season to maximize forage yield, quality, and 28 d between harvests, respectively) were subplots in a randomized stand persistence. complete block in a split-plot arrangement. Cumulatively, over 5 yr, Research from Georgia suggests that harvesting al-Pioneer 5373 produced 6% (2.8 Mg ha Ϫ1 ) more forage than Alfagraze and 10% (5.0 Mg ha Ϫ1 ) more than Cody. Alfalfa harvested four times falfa frequently during the growing season may be less yielded 7% (0.8 Mg ha Ϫ1 ) more per year than when harvested five detrimental for grazing-type cultivars than for traditimes, and 28% (3.1 Mg ha Ϫ1 ) more than when harvested six times.tional hay-types Bouton, 1991, 1992).Alfagraze and the hay-types yielded equally when harvested six times. Brummer and Bouton (1991) found that Alfagraze, a Alfagraze usually had equal or lower detergent fiber, and equal or cultivar selected under continuous grazing pressure, was greater crude protein (CP) concentrations than other cultivars. Harmorphologically different than modern hay-types, being vesting more frequently improved forage quality but had little impact more decumbent and having many, thin stems compared on plant density. We concluded that a grazing-type, like Alfagraze, with modern hay-types. They suggested that these mordoes not show a yield or persistence advantage over a modern hayphological traits made grazing-type alfalfa cultivars toltype under frequent hay harvest regimes in the lower Midwest. Howerant of frequent harvests. Subsequent research with ever, the grazing-type used in this study often had superior forage quality.