2013
DOI: 10.14358/pers.79.1.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automatic Approach to UAV Flight Planning and Control for Photogrammetric Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The flight planning was done using the in-house software, MFlip and PFlip, for the UAV and paratrike flights, respectively [24]. The main difference between both flights was the type of flight planning: for the paratrike, a standard stereoscopic photogrammetric flight was undertaken (Figure 3a), whereas for the case of UAV, oblique and vertical images were also considered.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flight planning was done using the in-house software, MFlip and PFlip, for the UAV and paratrike flights, respectively [24]. The main difference between both flights was the type of flight planning: for the paratrike, a standard stereoscopic photogrammetric flight was undertaken (Figure 3a), whereas for the case of UAV, oblique and vertical images were also considered.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for the UAV, a script was prepared for an automatic photogrammetric flight; whereas for the paratrike, the flight axis and flight height were planned and followed by the pilot. Both flights were planned with higher overlaps in order to get better results in the dense matching process and both flights were planned considering the relief variation using a public digital terrain model (DTM) [24].…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies in the area (Zazo and Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, 2014;Zazo et al, 2015), the planned flight height was established at 200 m above ground level. Flight planning and execution was determined by MFLIP software (Hernandez-Lopez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Photogrammetric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planning and execution of flight was carried out with MFlip software (Hernandez-Lopez et al, 2013) taking into account the overlap between images and GSD variation due to terrain, as well as estimated errors of aircraft positioning.…”
Section: Stage-1 Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%