2013 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting 2013
DOI: 10.1109/pesmg.2013.6672132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic method for power system stabilizers phase compensation design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include poleplacement, 11 partial pole-placement, 12 eigen-structure assignment, [13][14][15] phase compensation, 16,17 and phase shaping. 18 The pole-placement is a straightforward method with an advantage of assignment of the closed-loop poles, however, leading to complex models and, therefore, the difficulty in designing complex controllers arises. 19 Furthermore, many classical methods prevalent in the literature [20][21][22][23][24] require reduction of the system model before designing the controllers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include poleplacement, 11 partial pole-placement, 12 eigen-structure assignment, [13][14][15] phase compensation, 16,17 and phase shaping. 18 The pole-placement is a straightforward method with an advantage of assignment of the closed-loop poles, however, leading to complex models and, therefore, the difficulty in designing complex controllers arises. 19 Furthermore, many classical methods prevalent in the literature [20][21][22][23][24] require reduction of the system model before designing the controllers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been applied based on classical control theory to PSS design task. These include pole‐placement, partial pole‐placement, eigen‐structure assignment, phase compensation, and phase shaping . The pole‐placement is a straightforward method with an advantage of assignment of the closed‐loop poles, however, leading to complex models and, therefore, the difficulty in designing complex controllers arises .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust design of PSSs is to achieve desired performance over multiple operating modes. Many robust design methods have been reported such as eigenstructure assignment [4], P-vr method [5,6], computational technique [7], and search-based method [8][9][10]. Coordinated design of PSSs is to coordinate the parameters of different PSSs in multimachine power systems so that the overall system's stability is improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mathematical model of electrical turbine generators connected to an electrical system, it is not always possible to determine exactly all the parameters. Moreover, because of simplification and linearization of models there is the so-called unmodeled dynamics [11,12]. This leads to the fact that the system stabilizers that are synthesized for one set of model parameters do not always provide the desired level of stability and quality control for other parameters values within the permissible limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%