2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-012-1095-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic microfluidic system for rapid screening of cancer stem-like cell-specific aptamers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these and other advances are promising, much of the microfluidic SELEX work has focused on the selection step of the aptamer isolation process (Ahn et al 2011, 2012; Kim et al 2011; Park et al 2009). Despite a significant field of literature that has demonstrated integration of amplification with a variety of other functions (Zhang and Xing 2007), there are fewer examples of integrated aptamer isolation microchips with both selection and amplifica-tion stages (Hung et al 2014; Weng et al 2013). Some integrated prototypes suffer from a lack of miniaturization (Hybarger et al 2006) or risk cross-contamination by providing inadequate partitioning between reaction products and reactants (Huang et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these and other advances are promising, much of the microfluidic SELEX work has focused on the selection step of the aptamer isolation process (Ahn et al 2011, 2012; Kim et al 2011; Park et al 2009). Despite a significant field of literature that has demonstrated integration of amplification with a variety of other functions (Zhang and Xing 2007), there are fewer examples of integrated aptamer isolation microchips with both selection and amplifica-tion stages (Hung et al 2014; Weng et al 2013). Some integrated prototypes suffer from a lack of miniaturization (Hybarger et al 2006) or risk cross-contamination by providing inadequate partitioning between reaction products and reactants (Huang et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other types of negative-pressure-driven microfluidic components can be found in the literature. [27][28][29] The normally closed valve and micromixer were controlled and driven using a vacuum pump connected to an electromagnetic valve (EMV), and fluid transport was achieved using a syringe pump (Legato 180, KD Scientific Inc., Holliston, MA) connected to the waste outlet channel that was driven with a withdrawing force by opening the inlet to atmospheric pressure. Using a personal computer, control of the fluid in the microchannel can be performed automatically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA was cloned into pCR TM 2.1-TOPO V R (Invitrogen, USA), total 33 colonies for HCT-8 specific peptide and 55 colonies for CRSC specific peptides were selected and checked by using plasmid extraction mini kit (FavorPrepTM Plasmid Extraction Kit/Favorgen, Taiwan) and PCR to ensure that each individual colony has DNA segment of interest. 16,24…”
Section: B Experimental Process Of On-chip Phage Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K d value of the peptide was measured using flow cytometry (C6 Cytometer-BD Biosciences, BD Accuri TM , USA). 23,24 The cell number of the target cells was fixed to be 2 Â 10 5 and the concentration of the specific peptide used varied with 2-fold serial dilutions from 1 lM to 10 nM. Note that the binding site of the specific peptide was assumed to be only one.…”
Section: E Specificity Test and Dissociation Constant (K D ) Measurementioning
confidence: 99%