2016
DOI: 10.7236/jiibc.2016.16.2.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic pronunciation evaluation system using non-native teacher's speech model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adjusting parameters in hidden Markov models and improving the Viterbi algorithm, models with relatively low con dence in the recognition process are trimmed, in order to achieve higher recognition accuracy and shorter matching time. However, this method has a large space complexity in the back-end decoding algorithm, which restricts the scalability of the overall speech recognition system [8]. e acoustic model of the convolutional neural network was established by Qin et al for speech recognition.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjusting parameters in hidden Markov models and improving the Viterbi algorithm, models with relatively low con dence in the recognition process are trimmed, in order to achieve higher recognition accuracy and shorter matching time. However, this method has a large space complexity in the back-end decoding algorithm, which restricts the scalability of the overall speech recognition system [8]. e acoustic model of the convolutional neural network was established by Qin et al for speech recognition.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASR technology, a software that uses consistent algorithms to analyze and recognize spoken language, has been widely used in various applications, including voice assistants, language translation, and speech-to-text (STT) transcription. The use of ASR technology in language education has been ongoing since the early 21st century (Park, 2017;Park et al, 2016). However, due to the lack of notable technological advancements at that time, it is difficult to compare it with recent research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%