2021
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatized workflow from molecular dynamic simulation to quantum chemical methods to identify elementary reactions and compute reaction constants

Abstract: We present an automatized workflow which, starting from molecular dynamics simulations, identifies reaction events, filters them, and prepares them for accurate quantum chemical calculations using, for example, Density Functional Theory (DFT) or Coupled Cluster methods. The capabilities of the automatized workflow are demonstrated by the example of simulations for the combustion of some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). It is shown how key elementary reaction candidates are filtered out of a much larger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three variants of GFNn-xTB that are developed ( n = 0, 1, and 2), which differ in accuracy and efficiency. They have been successfully applied in the optimization of organometallic complexes, structure sampling, exploring the reaction profiles, and macromolecule structure optimization. In addition, the electronic effects are still included at the semiempirical level of theory, which are challenging systems for the DFT method . The empirical FF parameters for the GFN2-xTB method are fitted to reproduce the results of DFT (B97-3c) .…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three variants of GFNn-xTB that are developed ( n = 0, 1, and 2), which differ in accuracy and efficiency. They have been successfully applied in the optimization of organometallic complexes, structure sampling, exploring the reaction profiles, and macromolecule structure optimization. In addition, the electronic effects are still included at the semiempirical level of theory, which are challenging systems for the DFT method . The empirical FF parameters for the GFN2-xTB method are fitted to reproduce the results of DFT (B97-3c) .…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Found elementary steps are then assigned to reactions (either they define a new reaction or they are another path for a known reaction to occur). Many single-ended and multiended time-independent search algorithms as well as molecular dynamics based approaches have been described in the literature that can be used for this purpose , , and our implementation is general enough to accommodate many of them (up to the point where they could be directly compared within one software framework).…”
Section: Algorithm Development For Finding New Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of detail is rooted in limited experimental information available on a specific process and in limited quantum chemical data that is difficult to gather by manual exploration. To alleviate this problem, automated mechanism-exploration procedures have been developed in the past decade. Accompanying these algorithmic developments, various types of exploration software have been described; examples are NetGen , GRMM , ZStruct , Chemoton , RMG , , AARON , KinBot , ChemTrayZer , Nanoreactor , autodE , YARP , AutoMeKin2021 , and many more. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original implementation, the smallest allowed multiplicities were always assigned, despite being well aware that such a procedure does not always yield ground-state configurations, [30] e. g. for triplet oxygen vs. singlet oxygen. As a solution for this issue, we decided to follow the example of Schmitz et al [85] and probe multiple multiplicities for reactants, products and TSs. This is the second conceptual change compared to the original implementation of the coupling scheme.…”
Section: Conceptual Updates To the Chemtrayzer Rmd-qm Coupling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the second conceptual change compared to the original implementation of the coupling scheme. Similar to Schmitz et al, [85] our implementation only accepts combinations of multiplicities for reactants, TSs, and products that result in a spin-conserving reaction. However, while Schmitz et al only accept reactions that connect ground-state reactants and products, we also accept reactions connecting reactants and products with higher electronic energy states.…”
Section: Conceptual Updates To the Chemtrayzer Rmd-qm Coupling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%