2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2006.282110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Autonomous Robotic Fish for Mobile Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some of these applications can employ propeller-based robots, in others fin-based locomotion potentially offers better maneuverability, less noise and less disruption of the environment. In such devices, often termed robotic fish [22], fin movements are typically achieved with either small motors [4,6,21,23] or deformation of electroactive polymers [3]. For instance, Chen et al [3] demonstrated that a carangiform (that is, propulsion primarily generated by a caudal fin) robotic fish can successfully navigate the surface of water with a single actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of these applications can employ propeller-based robots, in others fin-based locomotion potentially offers better maneuverability, less noise and less disruption of the environment. In such devices, often termed robotic fish [22], fin movements are typically achieved with either small motors [4,6,21,23] or deformation of electroactive polymers [3]. For instance, Chen et al [3] demonstrated that a carangiform (that is, propulsion primarily generated by a caudal fin) robotic fish can successfully navigate the surface of water with a single actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include rigid plates or tensegrity structures actuated by servo-motors (Gao et al, 2007;Moored et al, 2008;Moored & Bart-Smith, 2009;Zhou & Low, 2012) and flexible membrane actuated by shape memory alloy (SMA) (Wang et al, 2009). However, these methods are not suitable for smallscale robots (on the order of 5-10 cm) (Shahinpoor, 1992;Mojarrad & Shahinpoor, 1996;Tan et al, 2006;Guo et al, 2003;Punning et al, 2004) because of either the limitations in scaling or high power consumption. To construct a free swimming and small-scale robotic manta ray, there is a need for a bio-inspired actuating material that is lightweight, compliant, resilient, and capable of generating 3 dimensional (3D) deformations with portable power consumption.…”
Section: Introduction To Bio-inspired Robotic Manta Raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct a free swimming and small-scale robotic manta ray, there is a need for a bio-inspired actuating material that is lightweight, compliant, resilient, and capable of generating 3 dimensional (3D) deformations with portable power consumption. In the past, IPMC actuators have been used as a caudal fin in bio-inspired robotic fishes (Shahinpoor, 1992;Mojarrad & Shahinpoor, 1996;Tan et al, 2006;Guo et al, 2003), where the propulsive fin mimics the bending motion observed in many biological fishes. In the propulsion mechanism of rays, undulatory and oscillatory flapping motions of the pectoral fin play an important role in generating highly efficient propulsion and maneuvering (Rosenberger, 2001).…”
Section: Introduction To Bio-inspired Robotic Manta Raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several interesting and unique types of robots have mimetics for the recent decades [1,2]. Particularly, a fishlike underwater robot is one of these categories.…”
Section: Introduction 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%