2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant

Abstract: The fouling of a spiral wound RO membrane after nearly one year of service in a brackish water treatment plant was investigated using optical and electron microscopic methods, FTIR and ICP-AES. Both the top surface and the cross-section of the fouled membrane were analysed to monitor the development of the fouling layer. It has been found that the extent of fouling was uneven across the membrane surface with regions underneath or in the vicinity of the strands of the feed spacer being more severely affected. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDSX spectra in Figure C14 show that the cake formation of run 21 has the carbon range of 77.6% -79.1% and oxygen of 13.8% -14.4%, suggesting that the majority of the fouled material is organic matter. However, the EDSX spectra of Figure C15 exhibit a high range of calcium (25.5% -59.1%), besides the high ranges of the carbon (7.9% - Overall, the results of the SEM images and EDSX spectra of the previously discussed runs revealed that the selected RO membranes have high rejection of organic matter, carbonate, and calcium, as also observed by Antony et al (2011), Koyuncu & Wiesner (2007), Tran et al (2007), and Koyuncu et al (2006). Another observation is that although the feed waters in locations 1 and 6 had high concentrations of sulfate (312-320 mg/L and 681-687.4 mg/L, respectively), sulfur peaks were at very low levels, as shown in some of the spectra of the runs, indicating that some potentially low level of CaSO4 precipitated on the membrane surface.…”
Section: Sem/edxs Analyses Of Fouled Membranessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The EDSX spectra in Figure C14 show that the cake formation of run 21 has the carbon range of 77.6% -79.1% and oxygen of 13.8% -14.4%, suggesting that the majority of the fouled material is organic matter. However, the EDSX spectra of Figure C15 exhibit a high range of calcium (25.5% -59.1%), besides the high ranges of the carbon (7.9% - Overall, the results of the SEM images and EDSX spectra of the previously discussed runs revealed that the selected RO membranes have high rejection of organic matter, carbonate, and calcium, as also observed by Antony et al (2011), Koyuncu & Wiesner (2007), Tran et al (2007), and Koyuncu et al (2006). Another observation is that although the feed waters in locations 1 and 6 had high concentrations of sulfate (312-320 mg/L and 681-687.4 mg/L, respectively), sulfur peaks were at very low levels, as shown in some of the spectra of the runs, indicating that some potentially low level of CaSO4 precipitated on the membrane surface.…”
Section: Sem/edxs Analyses Of Fouled Membranessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…High TOC forms complexes that enhance RO membrane fouling when some metals are present, such as Ca +2 (Antony et al, 2011;Tran et al, 2007;Koyuncu & Wiesner, 2007). The high permeate fluxes observed in the runs of locations 1 and 5, compared to those of location 6, are apparently due to a lesser scale formation on the membrane surface from the feed water with lower TOC and TDS concentrations.…”
Section: Membranes Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, in most cases, membrane fouling by natural organic matter, polysaccharides and inorganic material will occur, which can change substantially the membrane surface properties such as hydrophobicity [107], roughness [108] and surface charge [109]. Several membrane autopsies carried out on NF and RO membranes have showed the fouling layer to be composed of different materials [110][111][112][113], caused by the different water quality treated. The characteristics of the fouling layer can therefore be expected to influence the nature of subsequent bacterial adhesion and possibly biofilm formation.…”
Section: Conditioning Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%