1994
DOI: 10.1142/s0129167x94000425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Axiomatic Definition of Holonomy

Abstract: A group of loops [Formula: see text] is associated to every smooth pointed manifold M using a strong homotopy relation. It is shown that the holonomy of a connection on a principal G-bundle may be presented as a group morphism [Formula: see text] and that every such morphism satisfying a natural smoothness condition is the holonomy of some unique connection up to isomorphism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present paper this terminological twist should not lead to any confusion, since the paper is intended to be self-contained. Barrett's main result, also obtained in the setup of [10], shows that it is possible to reconstruct the bundle and the connection, up to equivalence, from the holonomy. This result is a nice strengthening of the well-known Ambrose-Singer theorem [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the present paper this terminological twist should not lead to any confusion, since the paper is intended to be self-contained. Barrett's main result, also obtained in the setup of [10], shows that it is possible to reconstruct the bundle and the connection, up to equivalence, from the holonomy. This result is a nice strengthening of the well-known Ambrose-Singer theorem [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In [SW09] we have instead equipped P 1 X with a diffeology, a structure that generalizes a smooth manifold structure [Che77,Sou81]. This diffeology on P 1 X has been introduced in [CP94]. For the convenience of the reader let us recall the basic definitions (see also Appendix A.2 of [SW09]).…”
Section: Diffeological Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we use Barrett's lemma [5] (see also [11,16]) stating that the trivial loop is a critical point for any holonomy. Note that Z(., j) restricted to loops based at y contained in U j satisfies the conditions to be a holonomy in the sense of Barrett's lemma, because of the thin invariance and smoothness of Z (Theorem 3.7).…”
Section: Remark 36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in gerbes has been revived recently following a concrete approach due to Hitchin and Chatterjee [15]. Gerbes can be understood both in terms of local geometry, local functions and forms, and in terms of non-local geometry, holonomies and parallel transports, and these two viewpoints are equivalent, in a sense made precise by Mackaay and the author in [16], following on from work by Barrett [5] and Caetano and the author [11]. In [16] holonomies around spheres and parallel transports along cylinders were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%