Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics - 1996
DOI: 10.3115/993268.993294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Earley-type recognizer for dependency grammar

Abstract: The paper is a first attempt to fill a gap in the dependency literature, by providing a mathematical result on the complexity of recognition with a dependency grammar. The paper describes an improved Earley-type recognizer with a complexity O(IGl2n3). The improvement is due to a precompilation of the dependency rules into parse tables, that determine the conditions of applicability of two primary actions, predict and scan, used in recognition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time complexity of projective parsers is comparable with context-free parsers: for the sentences of length n, it is in O(n 3 ) in the case of functional and bilexical dependency grammars (Lombardo andLesmo 1996, Eisner 1997). However, the projectivity condition for the parses restricts the admissible analyses to the subset of dependency trees that do not contain dependencies that cross one other in the drawings of the trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The time complexity of projective parsers is comparable with context-free parsers: for the sentences of length n, it is in O(n 3 ) in the case of functional and bilexical dependency grammars (Lombardo andLesmo 1996, Eisner 1997). However, the projectivity condition for the parses restricts the admissible analyses to the subset of dependency trees that do not contain dependencies that cross one other in the drawings of the trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The dependency structure is the analysis focusing on the modifying and modified relations among the words. The importance of such an approach has been widely recognized in recent years, and there are studies of the analysis procedure [4,7,9,21]. Proposed have been a method to resolve the syntactic ambiguity based on the dependency structure [5], and a method to generate the translated sentence based on the dependency structure [2,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The method where the dependency is generated based on the dependency constraint [7,21] (2) The head information is attached to the grammatical rule, and the parse tree is converted to the dependency structure based on that information [4,5,9] In either method, there arises a problem when the incremental dependency parsing is to be realized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the inadequacy of such formalisms, [5] suggests extending the notation of [4] with regular expressions in the righthand side, similar to the approach used in extended context-free grammars (for example, [6]). This approach was worked out in some detail in [7], and in a similar manner in [8], who present a string-rewriting version of gdg.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%