2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Early Cretaceous W-Sn deposit and its implications in southeast coastal metallogenic belt: Constraints from U-Pb, Re-Os, Ar-Ar geochronology at the Feie'shan W-Sn deposit, SE China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that cluster or vein biotitization is well developed very close to the quartz–cassiterite–wolframite quartz vein type orebodies in the host rock (Figure a), and under microscope cassiterite can be found coexisting with hydrothermal biotite and fluorite in biotitization vein (Figure f). Although muscovite is known as the common alteration mineral closely related to the mineralization in many greisen–quartz vein type Sn deposits, there are also good cases in which biotitization is a typical hydrothermal alteration showing intimate relationship with Sn–(W) mineralization like Tiantangshan, such as the Feie'shan W–Sn deposit in South China (Liu et al, ) and the Kalzas W deposit in Yukon (Lynch, ). Overall, at the mining scale, intrusive‐centred alteration zonation is well developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that cluster or vein biotitization is well developed very close to the quartz–cassiterite–wolframite quartz vein type orebodies in the host rock (Figure a), and under microscope cassiterite can be found coexisting with hydrothermal biotite and fluorite in biotitization vein (Figure f). Although muscovite is known as the common alteration mineral closely related to the mineralization in many greisen–quartz vein type Sn deposits, there are also good cases in which biotitization is a typical hydrothermal alteration showing intimate relationship with Sn–(W) mineralization like Tiantangshan, such as the Feie'shan W–Sn deposit in South China (Liu et al, ) and the Kalzas W deposit in Yukon (Lynch, ). Overall, at the mining scale, intrusive‐centred alteration zonation is well developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63%) [22]. In addition, the large-scale Sn mineralization in this region is closely related to the Middle Jurassic granitic magmatism, although some Triassic and Cretaceous mineralized events have been reported [39][40][41][42]. The ages of Sn-dominated polymetallic mineralization in the Dayishan ore field, including the Maozaishan deposit, are consistent with the period of large-scale W-Sn polymetallic mineralization event in Nanling Range (165-150 Ma) [6].…”
Section: Timing Of Mineralization and Granitic Magmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on field relations and existing geochronological data, Mao et al [68] proposed that the Mesozoic W-polymetallic mineralization in South China can be divided into three episodes: Late Triassic W-Sn-Nb-Ta mineralization (230-210 Ma), Late Jurassic W-Sn mineralization (160-150 Ma), and the Early Cretaceous Sn-W-Cu-Au mineralization (134-80 Ma). The Jurassic and Cretaceous mineralization may were formed under a continental arc environment, with widespread magmatism and related metallogenic events caused by the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate [68,69]. Previous studies considered that ca.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting Of the Shimensi Depositmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Mao et al [71] proposed that there was also a weak W-Cu mineralization epoch during 147-136 Ma in South China. It is generally accepted that continental crust extension occurred in South China during the Cretaceous, which was characterized by mafic dykes, pull-apart basins, and volcanic basins [12,[69][70][71]. Crust-mantle interactions were important in forming the granite-related W polymetallic deposits of the Nanling and adjacent areas in the South China interior and were probably related to the magmatic and hydrothermal activities associated with lithospheric thinning in South China.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting Of the Shimensi Depositmentioning
confidence: 99%