2003
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An easy way to determine simultaneously the electron density and temperature in high-pressure plasmas by using Stark broadening

Abstract: This paper discusses the possibility of determining, at the same time, both the electron density and temperature in a discharge produced at atmospheric pressure using the Stark broadening of lines spontaneously emitted by a plasma. This direct method allows us to obtain experimental results that are in good agreement with others previously obtained for the same type of discharge. Its advantages and disadvantages compared to other direct methods of diagnostics, namely Thomson scattering, are also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…96 With regard to the articles cited, they can be divided into broad categories dealing with population distributions and deviations from equilibrium, [97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110] classification of diagnostic methods, 111,112 local and space-integrated intensity definitions, 113,114 ion-toneutral ratios and their diagnostic relevance, [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125] line-to-continuum ratios, [126][127][128][129][130][131] scattering methods, [132][133][134][135] evaluation of electron number density and plasma temperature, including Stark broadening of H-lines, Stark broadening of non-hydrogenic transitions, influence of the instrumental profile, [199][200][201][202][203][204] calibration of...…”
Section: Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium Theoretical Equilibrium Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…96 With regard to the articles cited, they can be divided into broad categories dealing with population distributions and deviations from equilibrium, [97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110] classification of diagnostic methods, 111,112 local and space-integrated intensity definitions, 113,114 ion-toneutral ratios and their diagnostic relevance, [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125] line-to-continuum ratios, [126][127][128][129][130][131] scattering methods, [132][133][134][135] evaluation of electron number density and plasma temperature, including Stark broadening of H-lines, Stark broadening of non-hydrogenic transitions, influence of the instrumental profile, [199][200][201][202][203][204] calibration of...…”
Section: Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium Theoretical Equilibrium Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The format of the table is similar to that given and discussed by Wiese. 35 De Regt et al 111 and Torres et al 112 have classified the methods as direct or indirect, and as active or passive. Methods are considered ''direct'' when they allow the value of the parameter of interest (T, n e ) to be obtained without making any assumption about the type and degree of equilibrium existing in the plasma.…”
Section: Expression Description Equation Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5][6] We use the microfield model method, a computational simulation theory due to Gigosos et al 7 applied to the three first Balmer series lines ͑H ␣ , H ␤ , and H ␥ ͒ in a nonequilibrium ͑two-temperature͒ plasma. The broadening of different spectral lines depends differently on n e and T e .…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 The electron density in the LIB plasma was determined by measuring the Stark broadening of the Balmer-␤ spectral line. 51 The simple relation between the electron density N e in cm −3 and the Stark broadening of the Balmer-␤ spectral line, for electron temperature in the range of 1 -4 eV ͑1 eV/ k B = 1.160 450 5͑20͒ ϫ 10 4 K͒ and electron density between 10 14 and 10 18 cm −3 , is N e = 1.09 ϫ 10 16 ͓⌬ 1/2 S ͑H ␤ ͔͒ 1.458 , ͑6͒…”
Section: ͑4͒mentioning
confidence: 99%