2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An eccentric companion at the edge of the brown dwarf desert orbiting the 2.4Mgiant star HIP 67537

Abstract: We report the discovery of a substellar companion around the giant star HIP 67537. Based on precision radial velocity measurements from CHIRON and FEROS high-resolution spectroscopic data, we derived the following orbital elements for HIP 67537 b: m b sini= 11.1 +0.4 −1.1 M jup , a = 4.9 +0.14 −0.13 AU and e = 0.59 +0.05 −0.02 . Considering random inclination angles, this object has 65% probability to be above the theoretical deuterium-burning limit, thus it is one of the few known objects in the planet to bro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors estimated the upper limit of the occurrence rate of BDs around these stars to be below 4%. An occurrence rate of 1.6% for BDs around intermediate-mass giant and main-sequence stars was estimated by Jones et al [236], which is slightly higher than the rate around lower mass stars. A similar occurrence rate of about 2% for BDs orbiting white dwarfs (these are typically progeny of AF-type main sequence stars) was determined by Girven et al [237] 29 , again giving a tentative evidence that BD formation might be more efficient around massive stars.…”
Section: Very Massive Giants and Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These authors estimated the upper limit of the occurrence rate of BDs around these stars to be below 4%. An occurrence rate of 1.6% for BDs around intermediate-mass giant and main-sequence stars was estimated by Jones et al [236], which is slightly higher than the rate around lower mass stars. A similar occurrence rate of about 2% for BDs orbiting white dwarfs (these are typically progeny of AF-type main sequence stars) was determined by Girven et al [237] 29 , again giving a tentative evidence that BD formation might be more efficient around massive stars.…”
Section: Very Massive Giants and Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A similar occurrence rate of about 2% for BDs orbiting white dwarfs (these are typically progeny of AF-type main sequence stars) was determined by Girven et al [237] 29 , again giving a tentative evidence that BD formation might be more efficient around massive stars. Interestingly, the parent stars of the BD candidates detected in Jones et al [236] are metal-rich. According to the CA model of Mordasini et al [19] the formation of super-massive planets and BDs are possible in massive and metal-rich disks at large distances.…”
Section: Very Massive Giants and Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The close BD occurrence rate for solar-mass stars is estimated to be <1% for P < 5 yr (or sma 3 au; see Grether & Lineweaver 2006) and around 0.6% for P 1 yr (Sahlmann et al 2011;Grieves et al 2017). Jones et al (2017) have found an occurrence rate of 1.2 1.5 −0.4 % for BD companions within 5 au around evolved intermediate-mass giant stars off the main-sequence (1.6 2 −0.5 % when restricted to stars ≥1.5 M ), A87, page 17 of 30 A&A 621, A87 (2019) 1-13 1-10 84 0 0.2 0.5 0-1.8 0-3 ≤1.8 (Jupiters) 71 0 0.4 1.4 0-4.5 0-7.6 ≤4.5 95 0 0.1 0.9 0-2.8 0-4.8 ≤2.8 10-100 72 0 0.4 0.6 0-2.1 0-3.5 ≤2.1 49 0 1 2 0-6.5 0-11 ≤6.5 91 0 0.1 0.9 0-2.9 0-5 ≤2.9 100-1000 58 4 2.9 3.1 2.2-5.5 1.2-7.9 3.1 +2.4 −0.9 30 0 2.3 3.2 0-10.4 0-17.7 ≤10.4 82 4 0.9 4.1 2.9-7.1 1.6-10.2 4.1 +3 −1.2 1-100 78 0 0.3 0.6 0-1.9 0-3.2 ≤1.9 60 0 0.7 1.6 0-5.3 0-9 ≤5.3 93 0 0.1 0.9 0-2.9 0-4.9 ≤2.9 1-1000 71 4 1.6 2.5 1.8-4.5 1-6.4 2.5 +2 −0.7 50 0 1 2 0-6.3 0-10.8 ≤6.3 89 4 0.5 3.7 2.6-6.5 1.5-9.3 3.7 +2.8 −1.1 0.3-1 (Saturns) 1-10 76 0 0.3 1.1 0-3.5 0-6 ≤3.5 10-100 56 0 0.8 1.5 0-4.8 0-8.2 ≤4.8 100-1000 31 0 2.2 2.7 0-8.6 0-14.7 ≤8.6 1-100 66 0 0.5 1.3 0-4.1 0-6.9 ≤4.1 1-1000 54 0 0.8 1.5 0-4.9 0-8.4 ≤4.9…”
Section: Results From the Combined Sophie + Harps Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omiya et al 2009;Johnson et al 2010;Reffert et al 2015;Jones et al 2017). When Paper I was published, only 6 substellar companions 9 were known around stars more massive than ∼ 1.78 M and they presented much higher masses on average than for lower mass stars (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%