2020
DOI: 10.3390/cli8030038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ecolabel for the World Heritage Brand? Developing a Climate Communication Recognition Scheme for Heritage Sites

Abstract: This study develops a climate communication recognition scheme (CCRS) for United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Sites (WHS), in order to explore the communicative power of heritage to mobilize stakeholders around climate change. We present this scheme with the aim to influence site management and tourist decision-making by increasing climate awareness at heritage sites and among visitors and encouraging the incorporation of carbon management into heritage site… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Articles using quantitative methods (n = 21, 36.2%) incorporated surveys and sampling (n = 8, 13.8%), modelling (n = 7, 12.8%), GIS and remote sensing (n = 6, 10.3%) and, with far less representation, questionnaires (n = 4) and simulations (n = 2). Less common were mixed method approaches (n = 7, 12.8%), which involved a combination of interviews and questionnaire surveys e.g., [6,47], surveys, modelling and secondary data [48], archaeological sampling and secondary data [49], and modelling and secondary data [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Articles using quantitative methods (n = 21, 36.2%) incorporated surveys and sampling (n = 8, 13.8%), modelling (n = 7, 12.8%), GIS and remote sensing (n = 6, 10.3%) and, with far less representation, questionnaires (n = 4) and simulations (n = 2). Less common were mixed method approaches (n = 7, 12.8%), which involved a combination of interviews and questionnaire surveys e.g., [6,47], surveys, modelling and secondary data [48], archaeological sampling and secondary data [49], and modelling and secondary data [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on adaptation measures also incorporates studies that emphasise the importance of past knowledge (n = 7) e.g., [37,39,56] as well as the necessity of a more integrated approach (n = 8) e.g., [3,21,47]. Other articles (n = 5) point to the critical role of local communities in addressing the climate crisis and the need to draw on their wisdom in heritage management and conservation e.g., [6,32,33,48]. A focus on plans, policies and regulations is also present (n = 9), with an emphasis on comprehensive, integrated, and timely policies to tackle climate change impacts in a constantly changing context e.g., [57][58][59].…”
Section: Adaptation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That requires much more than objective measures of biodiversity, including aspects of composition, complexity, and abundance, particularly of species upon which OUV is based. This can be costly, and surrogates that can be remotely sensed will be useful [42]. Natural heritage sites are SESs, so monitoring must include the greater landscape.…”
Section: Monitoring and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tourism revenue sustains many heritage management practices. Global tourism was valued at $2.9 Trillion (USD) in 2019 [43], and heritage tourism accounts for approximately half of that value [42]. An economic force of that magnitude drives many decisions, including the risk that tourism becomes so financially attractive it destroys the site.…”
Section: Heritage Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation