1987
DOI: 10.54648/woco1987006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Economic Analysis of Dumping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the broader scope of predatory behavior, predatory pricing is one prevalent tactic which extends beyond economic-legal considerations to encompass dynamic relationships. In fact, in the realm of economic strategies, the aggressive pricing approach commonly known as price dumping (Boltuck, 1987; Jones, 2015; Serences & Kozelova, 2021) has emerged as a complex phenomenon with far-reaching implications posing challenges to fair market competition. In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce where competitive dynamics among businesses play a pivotal role in shaping market structures, indeed, dumping specifically involves the intentional sale of goods or services at prices lower than their production costs or market value, often as a strategic maneuver to unfairly steal a competitive edge (Porter, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the broader scope of predatory behavior, predatory pricing is one prevalent tactic which extends beyond economic-legal considerations to encompass dynamic relationships. In fact, in the realm of economic strategies, the aggressive pricing approach commonly known as price dumping (Boltuck, 1987; Jones, 2015; Serences & Kozelova, 2021) has emerged as a complex phenomenon with far-reaching implications posing challenges to fair market competition. In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce where competitive dynamics among businesses play a pivotal role in shaping market structures, indeed, dumping specifically involves the intentional sale of goods or services at prices lower than their production costs or market value, often as a strategic maneuver to unfairly steal a competitive edge (Porter, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%