An Economic Evaluation of Colesevelam when Added to Metformin-, Insulin- or Sulfonylurea-Based Therapies in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Abstract:In adult patients with T2DM, the addition of colesevelam to metformin-, insulin- or sulfonylurea-based therapies significantly improves glycaemic control while also reducing LDL-C, and these improvements could translate into substantial cost reductions due to reductions in the rates of diabetes-related and cardiovascular complications.
“…The predictive performance of UKPDS‐OM2 when using these risk factor equations was significantly improved relative to an assumption of holding risk factors constant and more accurately reflects the deterioration in metabolic control observed in the UKPDS cohort. More recent therapies or interventions may enable participants to improve the control of risk factors, and many recent economic evaluations involve comparisons of new therapies with the glucose‐lowering medications that were included in the UKPDS 23–26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent therapies or interventions may enable participants to improve the control of risk factors, and many recent economic evaluations involve comparisons of new therapies with the glucose-lowering medications that were included in the UKPDS. [23][24][25][26] Our analysis has a number of limitations. First, the data used to estimate the equations are increasingly historical and may in some cases reflect values or trajectories that are less commonly seen in contemporary populations.…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…The predictive performance of UKPDS‐OM2 when using these risk factor equations was significantly improved relative to an assumption of holding risk factors constant and more accurately reflects the deterioration in metabolic control observed in the UKPDS cohort. More recent therapies or interventions may enable participants to improve the control of risk factors, and many recent economic evaluations involve comparisons of new therapies with the glucose‐lowering medications that were included in the UKPDS 23–26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent therapies or interventions may enable participants to improve the control of risk factors, and many recent economic evaluations involve comparisons of new therapies with the glucose-lowering medications that were included in the UKPDS. [23][24][25][26] Our analysis has a number of limitations. First, the data used to estimate the equations are increasingly historical and may in some cases reflect values or trajectories that are less commonly seen in contemporary populations.…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…Simons and Hagan recently conducted a pharmacoeconomic analysis on the cost-effectiveness of the addition of colesevelam to metformin, sulfonylurea, or insulin. 80 The analysis evaluated data from 3 randomized controlled trials in which the addition of colesevelam to established metformin, sulfonylurea, or insulin therapy conferred an additional HbA1c reduction of approximately 0.5% ( P < .001) compared to baseline. 33,53,54 Validated models (diabetic risk equation [DRE] and the LIPID cardiovascular risk equation [LCRE]) were used to translate the observed clinical effects of colesevelam to monetary savings.…”
Colesevelam is effective as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM. Due to its effects upon LDL-C and glycemic parameters and favorable safety profile, colesevelam can play a role in an array of T2DM patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.