1986
DOI: 10.2307/2061408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economic model of teenage pregnancy decision-making

Abstract: In this paper, we model unmarried teenagers' decisions about their pregnancy outcome by considering that the teenager contrasts her expected utility (1) as a married mother, (2) as an unmarried mother, or (3) after abortion. We use cross-sectional data on 297 California teenagers aged 13-19 who were pregnant for the first time between 1972 and 1974. Both Anglo and Mexican-American girls are included. We find that pregnant girls who are eligible for or are receiving public assistance are more likely to give bir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the finding pertains to all women regardless of age, race, or ethnicity; however, Medicaid Status has a much greater impact on the probability of giving birth among adolescents than it does for adults as measured by the magnitude of the coefficients. The results for adolescents are similar to findings from a recent study of adolescents in California (Leibowitz, Eisen, and Chow 1986 Ignoring the impact of pregnancy resolution, the results for the prenatal care demand equations are in general conformity with the literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Again, the finding pertains to all women regardless of age, race, or ethnicity; however, Medicaid Status has a much greater impact on the probability of giving birth among adolescents than it does for adults as measured by the magnitude of the coefficients. The results for adolescents are similar to findings from a recent study of adolescents in California (Leibowitz, Eisen, and Chow 1986 Ignoring the impact of pregnancy resolution, the results for the prenatal care demand equations are in general conformity with the literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The error terms from the motherhood and schooling equations (ε S and ε F ) may not be independent if schooling and fertility decisions are both affected by some unobservable family or social characteristics. For example, individual discount rate is unobserved but affects teenage motherhood (Leibowitz et al, 1986or Wolfe et al, 2001) and schooling (Card, 1999). The correlation between ε S and ε F leads to biased estimates of the effect of teenage pregnancy.…”
Section: Educational Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for married women the fertility function is specified as (4 (Becker, 1981;Leibowitz et al, 1986;Lundberg and Plotnick, 1990;Rosenzweig and Schultz, 1985;T.P. Schultz, 1981T.P.…”
Section: Marriage 114mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leibowitz et al (1986) report evidence that AFDC benefits increase the likelihood that a pregnant teenager will decide to keep her child, rather than resort to abortion. Ellwood and Bane (1985) find some increase in the fraction of never married women age 24-34 with children in higher AFDC benefit states.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%