2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ecotoxicological screening tool to prioritise acid mine drainage impacted streams for future restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main product of this combination is sulfuric acid, giving the wastewater a low pH and high sulfate concentration. [1][2][3] The conventional treatment for AMD uses alkaline reagents to neutralize the pH and promote the removal of metals as hydroxides. Its major disadvantage, however, is the formation of sludge, which requires suitable disposal and does not allow for metal recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main product of this combination is sulfuric acid, giving the wastewater a low pH and high sulfate concentration. [1][2][3] The conventional treatment for AMD uses alkaline reagents to neutralize the pH and promote the removal of metals as hydroxides. Its major disadvantage, however, is the formation of sludge, which requires suitable disposal and does not allow for metal recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was possibly due to precipitation of Fe at pH values ≥ 4.0 making it inaccessible to algae, whereas at lower pH the dissolved Fe speciation changed due to microbial oxidation/reduction processes which make it more readily available for bioaccumulation by macroalgae. This phenomenon was previously reported by Oberholster et al (2013) in a study on the occurrence of benthic algae in the Bloubank stream, South Africa. Also, Fe is known to be important in photosynthesis and binds to the redox-active metal (a cofactor) found in proteins (Jeong et al, 2008;Kosman, 2010), which functions as protective mechanisms for survival of algae.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Metals Bioaccumulation By Various Algae Unmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The values of H’ and D were both within the range for normal diversity. In contrast, the value of d was indicated poor diversity, which may be due to the different calculation method for diversity index and the unrecovered evenness of zooplankton after the short-term EAS treatment 40, 41 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%