2013
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An edge‐based smoothed finite element method for 3D analysis of solid mechanics problems

Abstract: The edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) was proposed recently in Liu, Nguyen-Thoi, and Lam to improve the accuracy of the FEM for 2D problems. This method belongs to the wider family of the smoothed FEM for which smoothing cells are defined to perform the numerical integration over the domain. Later, the face-based smoothed FEM (FS-FEM) was proposed to generalize the ES-FEM to 3D problems. According to this method, the smoothing cells are centered along the faces of the tetrahedrons of the mesh.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The S‐FEM was firstly developed using strain smoothing techniques using quadrilateral (Q4) elements, and then many other types of novel ways of constructing smoothing domains was proposed. In general, S‐FEM can be classified, by the type of smoothing domains used, as cell‐based S‐FEM (CS‐FEM), edge‐based S‐FEM (ES‐FEM) for 2D problems, face‐based S‐FEM (FS‐FEM) for 3D problem, 3D–edge‐based S‐FEM (3D‐ES‐FEM), node‐based S‐FEM (NS‐FEM), and alpha S‐FEM . In these S‐FEMs, the ES‐FEM with 3‐node triangular elements and FS‐FEM with 4‐node tetrahedral elements are most preferred in solid mechanics, which is stable and much more accurate and robust than FEM using the same element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S‐FEM was firstly developed using strain smoothing techniques using quadrilateral (Q4) elements, and then many other types of novel ways of constructing smoothing domains was proposed. In general, S‐FEM can be classified, by the type of smoothing domains used, as cell‐based S‐FEM (CS‐FEM), edge‐based S‐FEM (ES‐FEM) for 2D problems, face‐based S‐FEM (FS‐FEM) for 3D problem, 3D–edge‐based S‐FEM (3D‐ES‐FEM), node‐based S‐FEM (NS‐FEM), and alpha S‐FEM . In these S‐FEMs, the ES‐FEM with 3‐node triangular elements and FS‐FEM with 4‐node tetrahedral elements are most preferred in solid mechanics, which is stable and much more accurate and robust than FEM using the same element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of the F‐bar method and the face‐based S‐FEM (FS‐FEM) leads to F‐bar FS ‐FEM in the same fashion with only two adjacent elements at most. Considering ES‐FEM has better accuracy compared with FS‐FEM in 3D , we focus on F‐barES‐FEM in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another point of view, this property of 3D-ES/NS-FEM-TET4 is also the cause of its good accuracy. Reference [26][27][28] also reported earlier are characteristics of 3D-ES-FEM-TET4, and they further tested the efficiency of 3D-ES- FEM-TET4, which is better than FS-FEM-TET4. 3D-ES/NS-FEM-TET4 should also inherit the batter efficiency than FS/NS-FEM-TET4 here.…”
Section: Example 1: Nearly-incompressible Rubber Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, spurious non-zero-energy eigen modes and temporal instabilities can arise, despite the fact that it is proven spatially stable (meaning that there is no spurious zero-energy modes) [18][19][20][21][22]. This temporal instability affects the solution of dynamics problems [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and static large deformation problems [30]. Several techniques have been proposed to deal with the temporal instability of NS-FEM, such as˛-FEM [32,33] and the stabilized NS-FEM [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%