Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)
DOI: 10.1109/dac.2003.1219028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective capacitance based driver output model for on-chip RLC interconnects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the conventional timing library format which stores the data for a cell in 2-D lookup tables (LUT) with indices as input transition time (S in ) and effective load capacitance (C ef f ) and outputs as output transition time (S out ) and gate delay is no longer sufficient to model a driver. To this effect, significant work has been done to approximate complex input waveforms by an equivalent waveform [11], to reduce the complex output loads to equivalent load capacitance [4], [9] and to find the delay for MIS using the SIS data [17], [7]. However, none of these methods provide an accurate and comprehensive method for obtaining cell response in the presence of complex input waveforms, output loads and MIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the conventional timing library format which stores the data for a cell in 2-D lookup tables (LUT) with indices as input transition time (S in ) and effective load capacitance (C ef f ) and outputs as output transition time (S out ) and gate delay is no longer sufficient to model a driver. To this effect, significant work has been done to approximate complex input waveforms by an equivalent waveform [11], to reduce the complex output loads to equivalent load capacitance [4], [9] and to find the delay for MIS using the SIS data [17], [7]. However, none of these methods provide an accurate and comprehensive method for obtaining cell response in the presence of complex input waveforms, output loads and MIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing errors of 0.5V dd -delay and 0.2 − 0.8V dd -slew of LTV models are listed in Table 5. We compare the accuracy of the LTV model with that of the 1-ramp and 2-ramp Thevenin models [3]. The timing statistics of 1-ramp and 2-ramp models are collected from 15 logic stages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Figure 2(a,b) shows an RC-network and its C eff . Agarwal et al used a two-ramp V th function and two C eff 's, one for each ramp [3]. This approach captures the RC-network loading effect but involves three parameters (two t r 's and one R th ) in the two-segment waveform matching.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%