2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2007.4370499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Effective MAC Scheme Based on Large Interference Range in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is essential to retain high power efficiency in quest for practical solutions to the large interference range problem. Recently, Shan, et al had proposed the probabilistic CTS reply (PCR) scheme to overcome the conservativeness problem of CCR [17]. In their stochastic scheme, in response to an incoming RTS, CTS is replied with a probability 1 À P I , where P I denotes the interference probability.…”
Section: The Large Interference Problem and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential to retain high power efficiency in quest for practical solutions to the large interference range problem. Recently, Shan, et al had proposed the probabilistic CTS reply (PCR) scheme to overcome the conservativeness problem of CCR [17]. In their stochastic scheme, in response to an incoming RTS, CTS is replied with a probability 1 À P I , where P I denotes the interference probability.…”
Section: The Large Interference Problem and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], [24], the transmission range (or area of coverage) is assumed to be equal to the interference range. However, in practice, some nodes may still interfere with the receiver even when the receiver is outside the transmission ranges of these nodes [20]. In our work, we relax this assumption so that the interference range can be larger than the transmission range and focus on the transmission radius control analysis in wireless ad hoc networks using smart antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the transmission range is assumed to be equal to the interference range in [3], [10]. However, considering the signal propagation, some nodes may still interfere with the receiver even if these nodes are out of the transmission ranges of both transmitter and receiver [8]. In our work, we assume that the interference range is larger than the transmission range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%