2011
DOI: 10.3354/aei00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective method for the recapture of escaped farmed salmon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…the exotic rainbow trout (both farm escapees and wild) and the native P. trucha, the former dominating at shallow depths and the latter at greater depths. Escaped (ERT) and wild (WRT) rainbow trout each accounted for c. one third of the total littoral capture (<4 m), coinciding with other studies on depth distribution of farm escapees (Chittenden et al, 2011;Skilbrei, 2012;Patterson and Blanchfield, 2013). Diet differences between species were marked, paralleling the observed segregation by depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the exotic rainbow trout (both farm escapees and wild) and the native P. trucha, the former dominating at shallow depths and the latter at greater depths. Escaped (ERT) and wild (WRT) rainbow trout each accounted for c. one third of the total littoral capture (<4 m), coinciding with other studies on depth distribution of farm escapees (Chittenden et al, 2011;Skilbrei, 2012;Patterson and Blanchfield, 2013). Diet differences between species were marked, paralleling the observed segregation by depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Farm escapees could affect wild fish behavior. Given that fish learn from the behavior and chemical cues of other fishes (Brown et al, 2003;Webster et al, 2008), the surface feeding and spatial use typical of rainbow trout farm escapees (Chittenden et al, 2011;Skilbrei, 2012;Patterson and Blanchfield, 2013) may influence the behavior of conspecifics, particularly those naïve fishes reaching the reservoir after birth in tributaries. In oligotrophic environments like those in Patagonia, where wild fish biomass is low (Quirós, 1990), the effect of the massive and sustained input of farm escapees on wild fish behavior is likely to be important, favoring a surface restricted distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High levels of fidelity to farm sites and consumption of waste feed are believed to minimize the impact of escaped fish by reducing competition with local fish for food and habitat (Phillips et al 1985) and by increasing the potential for their subsequent recapture if fish are targeted promptly (Skilbrei & Jørgensen 2010, Chittenden et al 2011. Alternatively, long-distance dispersal of farmed salmonids widens the area of possible impact, and hence risk associated with escapees (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic telemetry has been used to assess a wide range of research questions, such as movements of hatchery-reared fish after release (Mitamura et al, 2008), schooling behaviour around fish aggregating devices (FADs) (Mitsanuga et al, 2013), homing ability after displacements (Mitamura et al, 2012), evaluation efficiency of marine protected areas (Knip et al, 2012), harvest selection of behavioural traits (Olsen et al, 2012), effects of water pollution (Thorstad et al, 2013b) and movements of escapees from aquaculture fish farms (Chittenden et al, 2010;Solem et al, 2013). The method has also been used in a range of basic descriptive studies of fish behaviour in sea, estuaries and fresh water (Bendall et al, 2005;Naesje et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Acoustic Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%