2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective rolling decomposition-ensemble model for gasoline consumption forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the introduction of the rolling decomposition and prediction mechanism is very effective in improving the prediction performance. This result is consistent with the previous finding in Yu et al [65].…”
Section: Data Decomposition Analysissupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the introduction of the rolling decomposition and prediction mechanism is very effective in improving the prediction performance. This result is consistent with the previous finding in Yu et al [65].…”
Section: Data Decomposition Analysissupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This method can make full use of existing data to ensure the maximum knowledge learning. More details about rolling decomposition and prediction mechanism can refer to the Yu et al [65].…”
Section: Rolling Decomposition and Forecasting Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preprocessing of raw data is one of the difference between the three types of models above and the last type of model. The decomposition and ensemble models have been widely applied in many different fields as seen from previous literature, like gasoline consumption forecasting ( 34 ), marine cargo volume ( 35 ), foreign exchange rates forecasting ( 36 ), and container throughput forecasting ( 3740 ). For example, to better predict container throughput, Du et al ( 37 ) introduced a decomposition and ensemble model named variational mode decomposition–butterfly extreme learning machine–error correction strategy (VMD-BELM-ECS); its mean absolute error (MAE) is 2.8465, whereas ARIMA’s MAE is 13.4 and least-square support vector machine’s MAE is 12.64.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [32], they presented an excellent rolling decompositionensemble model for gasoline forecasting, which was both accurate and efficient. e researchers' experimental results demonstrate that the rolling decomposition-ensemble model is both accurate and resilient when it comes to projecting gasoline consumption levels and trends.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%