2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6154-8_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Effective Technique for Intrusion Detection Using Neuro-Fuzzy and Radial SVM Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With RBM in [17], the accuracy of intrusion detection is about 0.94, while the test dataset is not published. Adaboost [29], Auto‐encoder Network [30], Bayesian Network [31], Flexible Neural Tree [32], Radial SVM [33] have been used in other literatures, and the experiment results show that the accuracy is not as well as LSSVM‐IDS proposed in [34]. The proposed IDS model using NDNN is also compared with other ten methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With RBM in [17], the accuracy of intrusion detection is about 0.94, while the test dataset is not published. Adaboost [29], Auto‐encoder Network [30], Bayesian Network [31], Flexible Neural Tree [32], Radial SVM [33] have been used in other literatures, and the experiment results show that the accuracy is not as well as LSSVM‐IDS proposed in [34]. The proposed IDS model using NDNN is also compared with other ten methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I(C; f i ) is the amount of information that feature f i carries about the class C. MR, in (4), is the relative minimum redundancy of feature f i against feature f s and is defined by (5).…”
Section: Flexible Mutual Information Based Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that LSSVM-IDS + FMIFS enjoys the best results at 99.94% accuracy, 98.93% detection rate and 0.28% false positive rate. [45] 99.45 n/a n/a n/a n/a SVM + SA and FS [46] 99.42 n/a n/a n/a n/a TUIDS [19] 94.76 n/a n/a n/a n/a Radial SVM [5] n/a 98.94 97.11 97.80 97.78 Table 6 shows a comparison with the results achieved by CSV-ISVM proposed in [20] that has been tested on Kyoto 2006+ dataset. Through the results, both systems show continuous improvement in detection rates and reduction in false positive rates.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in literature review, a significant number of stateof-the-art IDSs, such as the ones in [20]- [24] , were evaluated using "10% of KDD Cup 99" data. Therefore, training and testing our system on the "10% KDD Cup 99" data can assist to provide a fair comparisons with those systems.…”
Section: A Training and Testing Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%