2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficacy randomized controlled trial of Reciprocal Reading in secondary schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The school teams also receive two support sessions from the expert trainer during delivery to consolidate learning. In line with previous research, training is needed to improve teacher knowledge, and contributes to changing professional pedagogies of reading instruction, in respect of scaffolding and supporting student-learning using cooperative structures to promote student's use of the four reciprocal reading strategies to improve their comprehension (O'Hare et al, 2019;Thurston et al, 2020). As well as training and support sessions, professional development includes practitioner manual, student resources and age-appropriate texts, as well as a community of practice (Lave & Wenger, 1991) for school staff to train and work together in teams, and meet and discuss implementation issues regularly.…”
Section: The Reciprocal Re Ading Progr Amme (Rr)mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The school teams also receive two support sessions from the expert trainer during delivery to consolidate learning. In line with previous research, training is needed to improve teacher knowledge, and contributes to changing professional pedagogies of reading instruction, in respect of scaffolding and supporting student-learning using cooperative structures to promote student's use of the four reciprocal reading strategies to improve their comprehension (O'Hare et al, 2019;Thurston et al, 2020). As well as training and support sessions, professional development includes practitioner manual, student resources and age-appropriate texts, as well as a community of practice (Lave & Wenger, 1991) for school staff to train and work together in teams, and meet and discuss implementation issues regularly.…”
Section: The Reciprocal Re Ading Progr Amme (Rr)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This was a well-conducted study with 35 schools working in clusters across a high poverty region in England with continued engagement by the sample to July 2021 despite COVID-19 pressures, including their commitment to continue their participation in the study until July 2022. Previous RCT studies reported positive outcomes from the implementation of Reciprocal Reading, in respect of improved student overall reading including reading comprehension with effect sizes of between ES+0.13 and +0.25 across this transition point between primary and secondary stages in education (O'Hare et al, 2019;Thurston et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Positive evidence of cooperative learning for literacy instruction in elementary schools with effect size of ES+0.20 is found in a meta-analysis including 18 studies in elementary schools (Puzio & Colby, 2013). Most recently, literacy trials using cooperative learning approaches to improve Reading outcomes also support this approach with positive effect sizes of ES+0.13-0.25 (Thurston et al, 2020) and ES+0.24 (Thurston et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theory Of Interventionmentioning
confidence: 95%