2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2018.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Algorithm for Automatic Structure Optimization in X-ray Standing-Wave Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other layers were not varied independently to prevent overfitting, after checking the lower layer consistency by the STEM results, which were within experimental error. Fitting was done using a standard R-factor, least squares, comparison of experiment and theory, and also making use of a new, more rapid and accurate search algorithm based on a versatile Black Box Optimizer [39]. The total R factor is the sum of each least squares fit of the YXRO computed and normalized RC with the relevant normalized experimental RC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other layers were not varied independently to prevent overfitting, after checking the lower layer consistency by the STEM results, which were within experimental error. Fitting was done using a standard R-factor, least squares, comparison of experiment and theory, and also making use of a new, more rapid and accurate search algorithm based on a versatile Black Box Optimizer [39]. The total R factor is the sum of each least squares fit of the YXRO computed and normalized RC with the relevant normalized experimental RC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 10,000 sample calculations, and found a good surface estimation at around 7,000 calculations. The Black Box method utilized [39] avoids local minima that often arise with other fitting approaches, and has been found to speed up data analysis by 10-100 times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative structural and interface information can be determined from the experimental rocking curves (RCs) by matching them to simulated RCs using YXRO and Black Box Optimizer programs. 8,11 2.2 Sample Preparation ½Si∕Mo 80 multilayer mirrors with a period of 3.4 nm were prepared by magnetron sputtering and used as standing-wave generators. The ½Si∕Mo 80 multilayer mirror terminates with the Si layer on top, and the native SiO 2 was not removed.…”
Section: Standing-wave X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many difficult optimization problems have been tackled successfully using surrogate model methods, e.g., in the structure optimization of nanomaterials [36], in cloud simulations [37], in climate modeling [38]; in watershed water quality management [22], and in aerodynamic design [39].…”
Section: Surrogate Models For Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization (...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial Basis Functions and Stochastic Sampling Our first approach ("RBF approach") to the HPO of learning models is based on RBF models with a cubic kernel. These models have previously been shown to perform well for various optimization problems including problems with integer constraints, see e.g., [22,36,44]. RBFs have the general form…”
Section: Steps 4-9: the Adaptive Sampling Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%