2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient algorithm to perform multiple testing in epistasis screening

Abstract: BackgroundResearch in epistasis or gene-gene interaction detection for human complex traits has grown over the last few years. It has been marked by promising methodological developments, improved translation efforts of statistical epistasis to biological epistasis and attempts to integrate different omics information sources into the epistasis screening to enhance power. The quest for gene-gene interactions poses severe multiple-testing problems. In this context, the maxT algorithm is one technique to control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One disadvantage of MDR is that its computational burden increases with the number of SNPs and the order of considered interactions. A parallel algorithm of MDR and MB-MDR has been implemented by Bush et al (2006) and Van Lishout et al (2011), respectively. Despite these efforts, filtering methods to preselect a subset of candidate factors and stochastic search algorithms (e.g., simulated annealing and evolutionary algorithms) are needed to assist researchers in the exhaustive search for interactions in genome-wide association studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of MDR is that its computational burden increases with the number of SNPs and the order of considered interactions. A parallel algorithm of MDR and MB-MDR has been implemented by Bush et al (2006) and Van Lishout et al (2011), respectively. Despite these efforts, filtering methods to preselect a subset of candidate factors and stochastic search algorithms (e.g., simulated annealing and evolutionary algorithms) are needed to assist researchers in the exhaustive search for interactions in genome-wide association studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDR uses model-free statistical methods and is reported as capable of identifying k-way interactions (k denotes the level of interactions). GMDR-GPU [79], Model-based MDR (MB-MDR) [80] are a couple of the latest improvements over MDR. BOOST is another popular exhaustive epistatic interaction prediction tool [81], and one of the fastest among the exhaustive methods.…”
Section: Gwas and Genetic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these tools are designed to take genotype array data as input. Overall, they can handle 100,000 to~500,000 SNPs from a few hundred to thousands of samples (balanced case-control) within a timeframe of 24 hrs to 60hrs [71,78,80,81,84]. These tools were used in a few independent studies to identify interactions between SNPs that may be associated with a particular phenotypic condition [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Gwas and Genetic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the underlying genetic models of the simulated data, we utilized one step of the model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction (MB-MDR) algorithm, which is an efficient algorithm to perform multiple testing in epistasis screening [34]. The procedure tabulates the frequencies of cases and controls in the 3 × 3 genotype combinations and uses a test for association between the trait and the specific genotype combination.…”
Section: Submodel Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%