2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2015.7248382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient and truthful pricing mechanism for team formation in crowdsourcing markets

Abstract: In a crowdsourcing market, a requester is looking to form a team of workers to perform a complex task that requires a variety of skills. Candidate workers advertise their certified skills and bid prices for their participation. We design four incentive mechanisms for selecting workers to form a valid team (that can complete the task) and determining each individual worker's payment. We examine profitability, individual rationality, computational efficiency, and truthfulness for each of the four mechanisms. Our… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maximize tasks and minimize payments, the researchers came up with the platform Mechanical Perk(MPerk) on top of Amazon's Mechanical Turk(MTurk), which provides a good basis for designing pricing mechanisms for crowdsourcing markets that can be even further extended. Others [22] developed an efficient and truthful pricing mechanism (TruTeam) for team formation in crowdsourcing markets. Among four different incentive mechanisms: profitability, individual rationality, computational efficiency and truthfulness, simulations confirm that the superior mechanism is an efficient and truthful pricing mechanism for crowdsourcing markets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize tasks and minimize payments, the researchers came up with the platform Mechanical Perk(MPerk) on top of Amazon's Mechanical Turk(MTurk), which provides a good basis for designing pricing mechanisms for crowdsourcing markets that can be even further extended. Others [22] developed an efficient and truthful pricing mechanism (TruTeam) for team formation in crowdsourcing markets. Among four different incentive mechanisms: profitability, individual rationality, computational efficiency and truthfulness, simulations confirm that the superior mechanism is an efficient and truthful pricing mechanism for crowdsourcing markets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work increased the efficiency of the auction but they ignore the price problem. Feng (11) presented four possible mechanisms: opt, greedy, VCG and TruTeamin to solve the allocation and pricing problems in set packing, and proved that VCG mechanism and TruTeam mechanism can efficiently allocate the resources with truthful and individual rational properties. The author proposed a strategy-proof incentive mechanism based on the VCG mechanism to deal with Mobile Crowdsourcing problem and achieved the desired design objectives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by this example, it is natural to think using social networks to form a team and then undertake the complex task. In fact, there are now some related studies that are often implemented by team formation in which a team of workers that can perform outsourced tasks is found through social networks [41][42][43]. However, the requesters must undertake heavy computing loads for selecting appropriate team members [41,42].…”
Section: Context-aware Reliable Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these related studies often assume that the team members are reliable, which may sometimes not conform to the actual situation [43].…”
Section: Context-aware Reliable Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation