2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient autofocus algorithm for a visible microscope on a Mars lander

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in order to analyze and view the results more conveniently and intuitively, this study normalizes all the results, as shown in Figure 5 . The non-subsampled contourlet transform (NSCT), Tenengrad algorithm [ 29 ], Roberts algorithm [ 30 , 31 ], discrete cosine transform (DCT) [ 32 , 33 ], energy of gradient (EOG) [ 34 ] algorithm, Canny algorithm [ 35 , 36 ], and Laplacian algorithm [ 37 , 38 ] are selected for this comparative experiment. The Tenengrad algorithm uses a Sobel [ 39 , 40 ] operator to extract gradient values in horizontal and vertical directions, and then calculates the gradient square sum of all pixels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in order to analyze and view the results more conveniently and intuitively, this study normalizes all the results, as shown in Figure 5 . The non-subsampled contourlet transform (NSCT), Tenengrad algorithm [ 29 ], Roberts algorithm [ 30 , 31 ], discrete cosine transform (DCT) [ 32 , 33 ], energy of gradient (EOG) [ 34 ] algorithm, Canny algorithm [ 35 , 36 ], and Laplacian algorithm [ 37 , 38 ] are selected for this comparative experiment. The Tenengrad algorithm uses a Sobel [ 39 , 40 ] operator to extract gradient values in horizontal and vertical directions, and then calculates the gradient square sum of all pixels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing was performed by translating the specimen along its axis in increments of the depth of field (40 μm). Algorithms for analyzing the successive focal planes have been developed [54]. The resolution was approximately 4 μm/pixel.…”
Section: Microscopes Used On Planetary Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire microscope was mechanically translated along its axis in increments of the depth of field in order to focus; in-focus elements were then combined into an image. Improved algorithms for such image processing have since been developed (Luethi et al , 2010 ). The resolution was approximately 4 μm pixel −1 .…”
Section: Instrument Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%