2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00773-018-0604-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient calibration approach for cavitation model constants based on OpenFOAM platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Jin et al [33] designed a model to relate the values of the condensation and evaporation coefficients to the operating conditions, trying, in this way, to overcome the limitation of using empirical constants. Other examples of optimization of these empirical parameters are the surrogate-based sequential approximate optimization (SAO) method considered by Zhou et al [34] or the machine learning method employed by Sikirica et al [35]. Both were applied within the Kunz mixture cavitation model and provided better performances in cavitation prediction and simulation than the use of constant coefficients.…”
Section: Homogeneous Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Jin et al [33] designed a model to relate the values of the condensation and evaporation coefficients to the operating conditions, trying, in this way, to overcome the limitation of using empirical constants. Other examples of optimization of these empirical parameters are the surrogate-based sequential approximate optimization (SAO) method considered by Zhou et al [34] or the machine learning method employed by Sikirica et al [35]. Both were applied within the Kunz mixture cavitation model and provided better performances in cavitation prediction and simulation than the use of constant coefficients.…”
Section: Homogeneous Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bensow et al [15] 20,000 1000 Morgut et al [17] 455 4100 Kunz et al [4] 100 100 Kunz et al [5] 0.2 0.2 Vaz et al [40] 10,000 500 Zhou et al [41] 4328 3323 Predicted 172 5 Figure 4 illustrates disparity in cavity extents depending on C prod and C dest . Included are experimental results, results obtained in this study and results for values presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Reference C Prod C Destmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included are experimental results, results obtained in this study and results for values presented in Table 5. [5], (e) Vaz et al [40], (f) Zhou et al [41], (g) predicted values C prod = 172, C dest = 5 and (h) experimental observations [30].…”
Section: Reference C Prod C Destmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue related to these models is the use of empirical coefficients, which are needed since the terms describing the condensation/vaporization processes are simplified version of complex physical relationship (the most indicative is perhaps the Schnerr-Sauer model, which considers only the terms of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation related to the asymptotic growth of bubbles). The condensation/vaporization coefficients C c and C v may be calibrated for the study of the specific problem such as the flow around a hydrofoil [22] or a marine propeller [23]; usually calibration of the coefficients is performed using optimization techniques [24], where the values of the coefficients are evaluated forcing the solution to obtain optimal values of some mean quantities, such as the pressure coefficient or thrust and torque coefficients, the latter in case of marine propellers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%