2004
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2004.829556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Chase Decoder for Turbo Product Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a single conventional SDD operation, the total number of computations required is 2  , while it is ( − ) + 2 + 2  ( − ) for the ULD. Thus, the relative complexity   , which is the ratio of the two terms, can be simplif ed to Table I presents   of the ULD as well as [6] for some of the codes reported in [3], and for typical values of . As it can be noted from the results, the achieved complexity reduction depends on the code used and on .…”
Section: B Uld Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a single conventional SDD operation, the total number of computations required is 2  , while it is ( − ) + 2 + 2  ( − ) for the ULD. Thus, the relative complexity   , which is the ratio of the two terms, can be simplif ed to Table I presents   of the ULD as well as [6] for some of the codes reported in [3], and for typical values of . As it can be noted from the results, the achieved complexity reduction depends on the code used and on .…”
Section: B Uld Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Table I shows that the ULD substantially outperforms [3], while [6] slightly outperforms the ULD, however, HDD is still required in [6]. Therefore, the ULD and [6] require almost the same number of ED operations, yet [6] requires most of the HDD operations which has to be performed 2  times for each row/column decoding.…”
Section: B Uld Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [2], test vector decoding is done in Gray code order, which reduces its complexity to 1 vectormatrix multiplication plus 2 p − 1 vector-vector multiplications in GF (2). In [3], dot product is applied instead of Euclidean distance. Only different bits between a valid code and Y contribute to the metric.…”
Section: Low Complexity Chase Decoding Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Chase decoding in Chase-MP algorithm, as suggested in [1], we set its weight factor to be 1/2, and reliability factor to be 1 for every iteration. The number of least reliable positions (LRPs) for the Chase-II algorithm is respectively selected as p = 3, 4, 5.…”
Section: B Simulation Performance With Comparisons To That Of Trellimentioning
confidence: 99%