The Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks 2016
DOI: 10.1201/b21185-91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient condition monitoring strategy of railway vehicle suspension based on recursive least-square algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 11 also shows that in model M3a, for the same unsprung mass and mean of the vertical stiffness, an increase of 10 kN/mm in the standard deviation of the vertical stiffness corresponds to a relative increase in the deterioration rates of 53.5% (l 2 Â 10 ¼ 0:535) for the SD b . This is line with previous findings in other set of simulations (Grossoni et al 2015), though this time the speed is lower and might have inflated the influence of the vertical stiffness standard deviation. 42 The influence of speed and axle load…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 11 also shows that in model M3a, for the same unsprung mass and mean of the vertical stiffness, an increase of 10 kN/mm in the standard deviation of the vertical stiffness corresponds to a relative increase in the deterioration rates of 53.5% (l 2 Â 10 ¼ 0:535) for the SD b . This is line with previous findings in other set of simulations (Grossoni et al 2015), though this time the speed is lower and might have inflated the influence of the vertical stiffness standard deviation. 42 The influence of speed and axle load…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is line with previous findings in other set of simulations (Grossoni et al 2015), though this time the speed is lower and might have inflated the influence of the vertical stiffness standard deviation. 42 The influence of speed and axle load…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The support stiffness was applied through spring elements in the effective length in both sides of the load position. Three support stiffness cases of 30, 115 and 200 kN/mm were investigated in an initial modelling phase assessed from recent literature 31,32 ; further cases with degraded support stiffness or sand 15 kN/mm were subsequently added. A minimum dynamic sleeper support stiffness of 30 kN/mm per sleeper end has been defined for a renewed trackbed and of 60 kN/mm for a new trackbed.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%