2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002540050477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient cost-sharing program to reduce nonpoint-source contamination: theory and an application to groundwater contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Improved onfarm irrigation effi ciency generally results in signifi cant water quality and environmental benefi ts (Huffaker, 2010;Kim et al, 2000;Schaible and Aillery, 2003;Weinberg et al, 1993). Effi cient irrigation "production systems" allow producers to improve their nutrient management practices through chemical application effi ciencies, reduced soil erosion runoff, improved salinity control, and improved drainage water quality.…”
Section: Irrigation Production Systems and Agricultural Water Conservmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Improved onfarm irrigation effi ciency generally results in signifi cant water quality and environmental benefi ts (Huffaker, 2010;Kim et al, 2000;Schaible and Aillery, 2003;Weinberg et al, 1993). Effi cient irrigation "production systems" allow producers to improve their nutrient management practices through chemical application effi ciencies, reduced soil erosion runoff, improved salinity control, and improved drainage water quality.…”
Section: Irrigation Production Systems and Agricultural Water Conservmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies including Kim and Schaible (), Kim et al. () and Schaible et al. () have demonstrated the need to differentiate between consumptive use and applied water.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (1997, 2000) and Kim and Schaible (2000) extend the traditional dynamic‐optimization framework for groundwater use/management by first disaggregating water use, recognizing both its consumptive use and applied water use components 8 . Second, we further extend this modeling framework, endogenizing crop‐ and technology‐specific per acre water use (disaggregated between consumptive and applied water use), as well as a conceptual framework for an acreage‐based technology adoption model—a decision framework reflecting the ability of producers to account for the potential benefits and costs associated with producer adoption of improved irrigation production technology under uncertainty.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%