2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10470-007-9038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient crest factor reduction technique for wideband applications

Abstract: This paper describes a new efficient crest factor reduction technique for wideband applications. The technique is based on using peak cancellation to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the input signal. Conventional iterative peak cancellation requires several iterations so as to converge into the targeted PAPR, since filtering causes peak re-growth. The proposed algorithm is able to eliminate several iterations, which subsequently saves hardware resources. In numerical simulations using four WCD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dual-band probing signal was composed by two orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals according to the 5G-NR standard, each with 20 MHz bandwidth and 30 kHz separation between subcarriers, and both bands had a separation of 80 MHz. It is worth mentioning that the original PAPR of the combined signal was lowered to 10 dB using CFR techniques in order not to exceed the measurement setup restrictions [16]. The average output power was 27.7 dBm and the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) between the input and output signals without predistortion presented a value of −20.9 dB.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual-band probing signal was composed by two orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals according to the 5G-NR standard, each with 20 MHz bandwidth and 30 kHz separation between subcarriers, and both bands had a separation of 80 MHz. It is worth mentioning that the original PAPR of the combined signal was lowered to 10 dB using CFR techniques in order not to exceed the measurement setup restrictions [16]. The average output power was 27.7 dBm and the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) between the input and output signals without predistortion presented a value of −20.9 dB.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control the PAPR and ensure stable performance across the range of possible input signals we employ a two stage PAPR reduction solution based on the scaled peak cancellation method (SPC) outlined in [20]. Figure 7 illustrates the basic operation of SPC, the signal is composed of all components of the input that are greater than the chosen clipping threshold.…”
Section: Stabilizing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFR has been used as protection to minimize the effects of having a signal with PAPR larger than the statistical mean value at which the predistorter has been previously trained during final tests (to avoid highly penalizing ACPR degradation). The peak cancellation (PC) technique described in [17] has been chosen as a clipping and filtering CFR method.…”
Section: Peak Cancellation Crest-factor Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%