2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17679-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Decentralized Algorithm for the Distributed Trigger Counting Problem

Abstract: Abstract. Consider a distributed system with n processors, in which each processor receives some triggers from an external source. The distributed trigger counting problem is to raise an alert and report to a user when the number of triggers received by the system reaches w, where w is a user-specified input. The problem has applications in monitoring, global snapshots, synchronizers and other distributed settings. The main result of the paper is a decentralized and randomized algorithm with expected message c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We only consider the case where the number of triggers is much greater than the number of nodes, i.e., (for , the works in [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] solve the problem with messages using spanning trees).…”
Section: Ddr-coin Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We only consider the case where the number of triggers is much greater than the number of nodes, i.e., (for , the works in [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] solve the problem with messages using spanning trees).…”
Section: Ddr-coin Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chakaravarthy et al proposed a near optimal DTC algorithm called LayeredRand [ 1 ]. The message complexity and MaxRcvLoad of this algorithm are and , respectively [ 1 ]. In [ 2 ], they proposed two DTC algorithms, which can be considered as an improvement of [ 1 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…log n log (w=n)) O(n log n log (w=n)) LayeredRand14 O(n log n log w) O(log n log w)CompTreeRand 21 O(n log w(log log n) 2 ) -CompTreeDet 21 O(n(log w log n) 2 ) O((log w log n) 2 ) CoinRand14 O(n(log w + log n)) O(log w + log n) RingRand14 O(n log n log w) O(log n log w) TreeFill O(n log (w=n)) O(log (w=n))The algorithms of Emek and Korman 21 are the bounds for arbitrary networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%