2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3138137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Deep Learning Framework for Distracted Driver Detection

Abstract: The number of road accidents has constantly been increasing recently around the world. As per the national highway traffic safety administration's investigation, 45% of vehicle crashes are done by a distracted driver right around each. We endeavor to build a precise and robust framework for distinguishing diverted drivers. The existing work of distracted driver detection is concerned with a limited set of distractions (mainly cell phone usage). This paper uses the first publicly accessible dataset that is the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…YOLOX(M) has the highest FLOPs [32], even surpassing the SSD, while mAP does not perform well enough, scoring only 66.60%, and EFFICIENTDET(D0) [33] has the worst FLOPs among the three, with only 1/3 of the FLOPs of the GhostNet-SSD. The CENTERNET algorithm, which has the best overall performance, also performs poorly compared to the GhostNet-SSD, with an mAP value 5.32% lower than GhostNet-SSD, and a running speed is only 57.08%.…”
Section: E Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…YOLOX(M) has the highest FLOPs [32], even surpassing the SSD, while mAP does not perform well enough, scoring only 66.60%, and EFFICIENTDET(D0) [33] has the worst FLOPs among the three, with only 1/3 of the FLOPs of the GhostNet-SSD. The CENTERNET algorithm, which has the best overall performance, also performs poorly compared to the GhostNet-SSD, with an mAP value 5.32% lower than GhostNet-SSD, and a running speed is only 57.08%.…”
Section: E Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To verify the advanced nature of the detection model in this paper, its AP, mAP, parameter quantity and model complexity were compared with those of the EfficientDet-D0, EfficientDet-D1, EfficientDet-D2, EfficientDet-D3 algorithms [27], and the optimal model of the YOLO series. In addition, since the DETR [28] requires 10 to 20 times more training epoch than modern mainstream detectors to converge, in order to get the performance of the converged DETR, epochs are added to the Table 2 for comparison with other DETR-based models [29], [30], [31].…”
Section: Results and Discussion 1) Comparison With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[107] designed a typical driver activities recognition system based on a vision-based sensor leveraging deep convolutional neural networks (CNN). The sensor could identify seven common driving activities by detecting the driver's body posture; similar work can also be found in [108][109][110][111]. This approach typically achieves almost 99% accuracy in detecting the limited driver activity.…”
Section: A Driver Distraction Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%